From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] drm/xe/gt_throttle: Avoid TOCTOU when monitoring reasons
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 11:47:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQOIdza-zd3ES9xw@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jnuis4h4uq7he4yq52rsb7ee6jffgclyf4skvftu3m3gsnk7xy@vhtbsgchkvyx>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 09:55:30AM -0500, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 10:53:36AM +0100, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 04:45:10PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > It's currently not possible to safely monitor if there's throttling
> > > happening and what are the reasons. The approach of reading the status
> > > and then reading the reasons is not reliable as by the time sysadmin
> > > reads the reason, the throttling could not be happening anymore.
> > >
> > > Previous tentative to fix that[1] was breaking the ABI and potentially
> > > sysadmin's scripts. This takes a different approach of adding and
> > > documenting the additional attribute. It's still valuable, though
> > > redundant, to provide the simpler 0/1 interface.
> > >
> > > In order to avoid userspace knowledge on the bitmask meaning and to be
> > > able to maintain the kernel side in sync with possible changes in
> > > future, just walk the attribute group and check what are the masks that
> > > match the value read.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/intel-xe/20241025092238.167042-1-raag.jadav@intel.com/
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +static const struct attribute_group *get_platform_throttle_group(struct xe_device *xe);
> > > +
> > > +static ssize_t status_reasons_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> > > + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buff)
> > > +{
> > > + struct xe_gt *gt = throttle_to_gt(kobj);
> > > + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> > > + const struct attribute_group *group;
> > > + struct attribute **pother;
> > > + ssize_t ret = 0;
> > > + u32 reasons;
> > > +
> > > + reasons = xe_gt_throttle_get_limit_reasons(gt);
> > > + group = get_platform_throttle_group(xe);
> > > +
> > > + for (pother = group->attrs; *pother; pother++) {
> > > + struct kobj_attribute *kattr = container_of(*pother, struct kobj_attribute, attr);
> > > + struct throttle_attribute *other_ta = kobj_attribute_to_throttle(kattr);
> > > +
> > > + if (other_ta->mask != U32_MAX && reasons & other_ta->mask)
> > > + ret += sysfs_emit_at(buff, ret, "%s ", (*pother)->name);
> >
> > Much better.
> >
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Drop extra space from last iteration above */
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + ret--;
> > > +
> > > + ret += sysfs_emit_at(buff, ret, "\n");
> >
> > I went through the documentation again and I couldn't find any rules
> > related to empty files or whether it is allowed (just thinking out
> > loud about no throttling cases).
>
> do you mean if "empty" files are allowed in sysfs? I don't think there's
> any problem with that. It's also not empty, it has a newline there ;)
alternatively we could print the entire reg in hex format?
But I prefer the text line in this patch.
Nothing against the 'empty' file with or without the new-line,
but perhaps we could consider to track that in the loop
and if none is add we print
if (ret)
ret--;
else
sysfs_emit_at(buff, ret, "none");
and document that above...
>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Raag
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 23:45 [PATCH v3 0/8] drm/xe: CRI support in gt_throttle + refactors Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-29 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] drm/xe/cri: Add new performance limit reasons bits Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-29 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] drm/xe/gt_throttle: Tidy up perf reasons reading Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-29 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] drm/xe/gt_throttle: Always read and mask Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-29 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] drm/xe/gt_throttle: Add throttle_to_gt() Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-29 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/xe/gt_throttle: Tidy up attribute definition Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-29 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] drm/xe: Improve freq and throttle documentation Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-29 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] drm/xe/gt_throttle: Drop individual show functions Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-29 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] drm/xe/gt_throttle: Avoid TOCTOU when monitoring reasons Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-30 9:53 ` Raag Jadav
2025-10-30 14:55 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-30 15:47 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-10-30 16:06 ` Raag Jadav
2025-10-30 18:43 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-30 19:54 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2025-10-31 6:08 ` Raag Jadav
2025-10-30 15:42 ` Rodrigo Vivi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQOIdza-zd3ES9xw@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.