All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Wojciech Siudy <wojciech.siudy@nokia.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: muxes: pca954x: Fix broken reset-gpio usage
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 16:48:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQjOwInKQWIVdjQJ@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69ef304b-491a-4434-97c1-97eccd99ea66@linaro.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1039 bytes --]


> Maybe I should also add to emphasize:
> 
> That offending commit 690de2902dca breaks the ABI which was:
> 1. documented at
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml (line 57)
> 2. implemented in Linux kernel around v3.14.
> 
> This ABI breakage was not justified at all, not explained not even
> mentioned in the commit msg, which is a requirement (see writing
> bindings document).

We were under the assumption that the reset-core will provide exactly
the same functionality at a centralized place. It made sense to me, too,
to avoid all the open-coded reset-gpio handlings in various drivers. I
only learnt from Morimoto-san's regression report that things were not
as I thought.

So, I sent out an RFC to discuss how to handle this issue. And if even
Philipp as the maintainer did not point me directly to revert the
offending i2c-mux commit, despite it is "obviously" sooo wrong, then
probably that optional fallback part in the reset-core needs way more
explanations and documentation.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-03 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03 15:19 [PATCH] i2c: muxes: pca954x: Fix broken reset-gpio usage Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-03 15:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-03 15:48   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2025-11-03 17:05 ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQjOwInKQWIVdjQJ@shikoro \
    --to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=wojciech.siudy@nokia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.