Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] gpio: dwapb: Use modern PM macros

[Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 12:15:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 2:50 AM Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Use the modern PM macros for the suspend and resume functions to be
> > automatically dropped by the compiler when CONFIG_PM or
> > CONFIG_PM_SLEEP are disabled, without having to use #ifdef guards.
> >
> > This has the advantage of always compiling these functions in,
> > independently of any Kconfig option. Thanks to that, bugs and other
> > regressions are subsequently easier to catch.
> >
> > The dwapb_context structure is always embedded into struct
> > dwapb_gpio_port to simplify code. Sure this brings a tiny 36 bytes
> > data overhead for !CONFIG_PM_SLEP. After greping the arm/arm64/riscv
> 
> SLEEP
> grepping
> 
> > dts dir, the max port number is 6, the berlin2q soc families, so this
> > means current we have wasted 216 bytes memory which is trivial
> 
> currently
> 
> > compared to the system memory.
> 
> I still think the embedding is not related to this change and should
> be justified in a separate patch. W/o that part the rest looks fine.

I got your mind now: it looks like you prefer a seperate patch for the
embedding. Let me explain why I have the embedding within this patch:
the pm_ptr() or pm_sleep_ptr() just optimizes out the PM functions, but the
PM funtions are still compiled, so w/o the embedding, it's impossible
to clean up the code with the modern PM macros.