From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
To: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debug: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() bug in __debug_object_init()
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 21:39:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRHrGOKBi5UrlyGf@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110075746.1680-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Hi Haotian,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 03:57:46PM +0800, Haotian Zhang wrote:
> The lookup_object_or_alloc() returns error pointers on failure, but the
> code only checks for NULL. This leads to dereferencing an invalid error
> pointer and causes a kernel crash.
>
> Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() instead of a NULL check to properly handle both
> error pointers and NULL returns.
>
> Fixes: 63a759694eed ("debugobject: Prevent init race with static objects")
> Signed-off-by: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> lib/debugobjects.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
> index 7f50c4480a4e..9587ef619054 100644
> --- a/lib/debugobjects.c
> +++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
> @@ -741,9 +741,10 @@ __debug_object_init(void *addr, const struct debug_obj_descr *descr, int onstack
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&db->lock, flags);
>
> obj = lookup_object_or_alloc(addr, db, descr, onstack, false);
> - if (unlikely(!obj)) {
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(obj)) {
Ideally, an API should either return error pointers to indicate errors
or solely return a NULL pointer to represent a failed operation. Mixing
error pointers and NULL pointers can easily lead to confusion about
what each represents.
In this case, it seems that lookup_object_or_alloc() only returns NULL
when alloc_object() fails due to being out of memory. Perhaps a better
approach would be to return -ENOMEM in this situation, then change the
check in __debug_object_init() to use IS_ERR(), and call
debug_objects_oom() when obj == ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM). I think this might
make the code clearer.
Regards,
Kuan-Wei
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&db->lock, flags);
> - debug_objects_oom();
> + if (!obj)
> + debug_objects_oom();
> return;
> }
>
> --
> 2.50.1.windows.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 7:57 [PATCH] debug: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() bug in __debug_object_init() Haotian Zhang
2025-11-10 13:39 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu [this message]
2025-11-11 2:15 ` [PATCH v2] debug: Fix a mixed use of NULL and error pointers Haotian Zhang
2025-11-13 19:49 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-11-13 20:03 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-11-14 1:56 ` [PATCH v3] debugobjects: Fix inconsistent return handling and potential ERR_PTR dereference Haotian Zhang
2025-11-15 23:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-16 18:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRHrGOKBi5UrlyGf@google.com \
--to=visitorckw@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.