From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] drm/i915/de: Register polling cleanup
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 21:09:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aROJ7aszCUX9ZaFG@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110172756.2132-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 07:27:39PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Clean up the register polling stuff:
> - rename the current wait stuff to
> intel_de_wait_{,for_set,for_clear}_ms()
> - introduce intel_de_wait_{,for_set,for_clear}_us()
> - nuke intel_de_wait_custom()
> - change the wakelock stuff to use _fw() instead of
> hand rolling yet another level of register accessors
> - a few other minor cleanups
>
> After this it should be fairly easy to switch over to
> poll_timeout_us().
>
> Ville Syrjälä (16):
> drm/i915/de: Implement register waits one way
> drm/i915/de: Have intel_de_wait() hand out the final register value
> drm/i915/de: Include units in intel_de_wait*() function names
> drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_us()
> drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_us()
> drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_ms() for the obvious cases
> drm/i915/de: Nuke intel_de_wait_custom()
> drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us()
> drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us()
> drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_ms()
> drm/1915/dpio: Stop using intel_de_wait_fw_ms()
> drm/u195/de: Replace __intel_de_rmw_nowl() with intel_de_rmw_fw()
> drm/i915/de: Nuke wakelocks from intel_de_wait_fw_ms()
> drm/i915/de: Replace __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl() with
> intel_de_wait_fw_us_atomic()
> drm/i915/power: Use the intel_de_wait_ms() out value
> drm/i915/dpio: Use the intel_de_wait_ms() out value
Pushed to drm-intel-next. Thanks for the reviews.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/hsw_ips.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/icl_dsi.c | 35 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 30 +++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crt.c | 16 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cx0_phy.c | 98 ++++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c | 34 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h | 107 +++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 +-
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 14 +--
> .../i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c | 42 +++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c | 25 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux.c | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_hdcp.c | 14 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpio_phy.c | 10 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 27 +++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_flipq.c | 8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c | 49 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lt_phy.c | 57 +++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lvds.c | 6 +-
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pch_display.c | 12 +-
> .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pch_refclk.c | 10 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pmdemand.c | 18 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 10 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sbi.c | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_snps_phy.c | 8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi.c | 54 ++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi_pll.c | 8 +-
> .../drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/intel_uncore.h | 31 ++---
> 34 files changed, 369 insertions(+), 402 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.49.1
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 17:27 [PATCH 00/16] drm/i915/de: Register polling cleanup Ville Syrjala
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/de: Implement register waits one way Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:52 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/de: Have intel_de_wait() hand out the final register value Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:14 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/de: Include units in intel_de_wait*() function names Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:21 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-11 17:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:24 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:28 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_ms() for the obvious cases Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:32 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-11 17:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/de: Nuke intel_de_wait_custom() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:33 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de_wait_for_{set, clear}_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:35 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_us() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:38 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set, clear}_us() Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set,clear}_ms() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:39 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/de: Use intel_de_wait_for_{set, clear}_ms() Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/1915/dpio: Stop using intel_de_wait_fw_ms() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:41 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/u195/de: Replace __intel_de_rmw_nowl() with intel_de_rmw_fw() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:44 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/de: Nuke wakelocks from intel_de_wait_fw_ms() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:45 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/de: Replace __intel_de_wait_for_register_nowl() with intel_de_wait_fw_us_atomic() Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:46 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/power: Use the intel_de_wait_ms() out value Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:48 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 17:27 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/dpio: " Ville Syrjala
2025-11-11 4:50 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-11-10 18:01 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/de: Register polling cleanup Patchwork
2025-11-10 18:02 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-10 18:17 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-11-10 18:46 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-11-10 21:24 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-10 23:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-11-11 3:41 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-11 8:01 ` [PATCH 00/16] " Jani Nikula
2025-11-11 16:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-11-11 19:09 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aROJ7aszCUX9ZaFG@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.