All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@linaro.org>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org, bill.mills@linaro.org,
	ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, javier.tia@linaro.org
Subject: bitbake, oe-core and meta-yocto tags in sync? (was Re: GPIT LAVA Test Report - Job 123474: OEQA ALL PASSED (24/75) passed)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:06:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRROLHFAmzOAbzRj@nuoska> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <691381dc.7b0a0220.35e53.800e@mx.google.com>

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 10:35:08AM -0800, ledge-bot@linaro.org wrote:
> LAVA Test Report for Job 123474
> ==================================================
> 
> GitLab Pipeline Information:
>   Project: gpit
>   Branch: main
>   Pipeline: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/trustedsubstrate/gpit/-/pipelines/2152817594
>   bitbake: 2c6c40bdab8ebc6c04fe9992524add967fb4a053
>   bitbake git describe: yocto-5.2.1-149-g2c6c40bda
>   openembedded-core: e556df28f47e754b53e1f46c97dde2b19fd8fad1
>   openembedded-core git describe: uninative-5.0-152-ge556df28f4
>   meta-yocto: 66ea31cee15309af07afeee8dec8a6fe1d92d28e
>   meta-yocto git describe: 5.3_M3-3-g66ea31c

So this is our first build and test run with separate bitbake,
oe-core and meta-yocto built using kas to replace old poky repo master
branch which no longer builds. Setup details in
https://gitlab.com/Linaro/trustedsubstrate/gpit

The "git describe" output with tags is a bit confusing. Would it be
possible to use same version/milestone names there?

Currently it's a bit hard to tell if the trees are fully in sync and if
yocto-5.2.1, uninative-5.0 and 5.3_M3 are compatible with each other
or not. From pure tags it is not easy to see if trees used same
branches, for example.

> LAVA Job Information:
>   Job ID: 123474
>   Description: gpit-kv260
>   Device: laa-00077-kv260
>   State: Finished
>   URL: https://ledge.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/123474
> 
> OEQA Test Results Summary:
>   Total Tests: 75
>   Passed: 24
>   Failed: 0
>   Errors: 0
>   Skipped: 51

But at least all executed oeqa rutime tests on core-image-sato
with genericarm64 machine passed on AMD kv260 which is the same
result as with poky from one week ago before its retirement.

> Passed Tests:
>   - connman.ConnmanTest.test_connmand_help
>   - connman.ConnmanTest.test_connmand_running
>   - date.DateTest.test_date
>   - df.DfTest.test_df
>   - oe_syslog.SyslogTest.test_syslog_running
>   - oe_syslog.SyslogTestConfig.test_syslog_logger
>   - oe_syslog.SyslogTestConfig.test_syslog_restart
>   - opkg.OpkgRepoTest.test_opkg_install_from_repo
>   - pam.PamBasicTest.test_pam
>   - parselogs.ParseLogsTest.test_get_context
>   - parselogs.ParseLogsTest.test_parselogs
>   - ping.PingTest.test_ping
>   - python.PythonTest.test_python3
>   - scp.ScpTest.test_scp_file
>   - ssh.SSHTest.test_ssh
>   - systemd.SystemdBasicTests.test_systemd_basic
>   - systemd.SystemdBasicTests.test_systemd_failed
>   - systemd.SystemdBasicTests.test_systemd_list
>   - systemd.SystemdJournalTests.test_systemd_boot_time
>   - systemd.SystemdJournalTests.test_systemd_journal
>   - systemd.SystemdServiceTests.test_systemd_disable_enable
>   - systemd.SystemdServiceTests.test_systemd_status
>   - systemd.SystemdServiceTests.test_systemd_stop_start
>   - xorg.XorgTest.test_xorg_running

And we now list the passing tests in this report.
I think this is a useful detail to have.

Cheers,

-Mikko
 
> LAVA Test Suite Results:
>   BITBAKE_COMMIT_HASH: 2c6c40bdab8ebc6c04fe9992524add967fb4a053
>   BITBAKE_GIT_DESCRIBE: yocto-5.2.1-149-g2c6c40bda
>   METAYOCTO_COMMIT_HASH: 66ea31cee15309af07afeee8dec8a6fe1d92d28e
>   METAYOCTO_GIT_DESCRIBE: 5.3_M3-3-g66ea31c
>   OECORE_COMMIT_HASH: e556df28f47e754b53e1f46c97dde2b19fd8fad1
>   OECORE_GIT_DESCRIBE: uninative-5.0-152-ge556df28f4
> 
> This is an automated test report.


       reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <691381dc.7b0a0220.35e53.800e@mx.google.com>
2025-11-12  9:06 ` Mikko Rapeli [this message]
2025-11-12  9:36   ` [Automated-testing] bitbake, oe-core and meta-yocto tags in sync? (was Re: GPIT LAVA Test Report - Job 123474: OEQA ALL PASSED (24/75) passed) Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aRROLHFAmzOAbzRj@nuoska \
    --to=mikko.rapeli@linaro.org \
    --cc=automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org \
    --cc=bill.mills@linaro.org \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=javier.tia@linaro.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.