From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk,
yi.zhang@redhat.com, czhong@redhat.com, yukuai@fnnas.com,
gjoyce@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 3/5] block: introduce alloc_sched_data and free_sched_data elevator methods
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:34:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRRiwBMmLzkD6bag@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112052848.1433256-4-nilay@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 10:56:04AM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> The recent lockdep splat [1] highlights a potential deadlock risk
> involving ->elevator_lock and ->freeze_lock dependencies on -pcpu_alloc_
> mutex. The trace shows that the issue occurs when the Kyber scheduler
> allocates dynamic memory for its elevator data during initialization.
>
> To address this, introduce two new elevator operation callbacks:
> ->alloc_sched_data and ->free_sched_data. The subsequent patch would
> build upon these newly introduced methods to suppress lockdep splat[1].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAGVVp+VNW4M-5DZMNoADp6o2VKFhi7KxWpTDkcnVyjO0=-D5+A@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq-sched.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> block/elevator.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.h b/block/blk-mq-sched.h
> index 1f8e58dd4b49..3ac64b66176a 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,21 @@ void blk_mq_free_sched_res(struct elevator_resources *res,
> void blk_mq_free_sched_res_batch(struct xarray *et_table,
> struct blk_mq_tag_set *set);
>
> +static inline void *blk_mq_alloc_sched_data(struct request_queue *q,
> + struct elevator_type *e)
> +{
> + if (e && e->ops.alloc_sched_data)
> + return e->ops.alloc_sched_data(q);
> +
> + return 0;
s/0/NULL
thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-12 5:26 [PATCHv5 0/5] block: restructure elevator switch path and fix a lockdep splat Nilay Shroff
2025-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCHv5 1/5] block: unify elevator tags and type xarrays into struct elv_change_ctx Nilay Shroff
2025-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCHv5 2/5] block: move elevator tags into struct elevator_resources Nilay Shroff
2025-11-12 10:37 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCHv5 3/5] block: introduce alloc_sched_data and free_sched_data elevator methods Nilay Shroff
2025-11-12 10:34 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-11-12 13:05 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCHv5 4/5] block: use {alloc|free}_sched data methods Nilay Shroff
2025-11-12 10:38 ` Ming Lei
2025-11-12 5:26 ` [PATCHv5 5/5] block: define alloc_sched_data and free_sched_data methods for kyber Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRRiwBMmLzkD6bag@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=czhong@redhat.com \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
--cc=yukuai@fnnas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.