All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@linux.dev>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modpost: drop '*_probe' from section check whitelist
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:48:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRS6VQCKB7dXGbXx@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251022203955.GA3256590@ax162>

Hi Nathan,

On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 10:39:55PM +0200, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:16:13AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Several symbol patterns used to be whitelisted to allow drivers to refer
> > to functions annotated with __devinit and __devexit, which have since
> > been removed.
> > 
> > Commit e1dc1bfe5b27 ("modpost: remove more symbol patterns from the
> > section check whitelist") removed most of these patterns but left
> > '*_probe' after a reported warning in an irqchip driver.
> > 
> > Turns out that was indeed an incorrect reference which has now been
> > fixed by commit 9b685058ca93 ("irqchip/qcom-irq-combiner: Fix section
> > mismatch").
> > 
> > A recently added clocksource driver also relies on this suffix to
> > suppress another valid warning, and that is being fixed separately. [1]
> > 
> > Note that drivers with valid reasons for suppressing the warnings can
> > use the __ref macros.
> > 
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251017054943.7195-1-johan@kernel.org/ [1]
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > As mentioned above there are still two drivers relying on the "_probe"
> > pattern to suppress valid warnings so perhaps it's best to hold off on
> > merging this until the corresponding fixes are in mainline (e.g. next
> > cycle or so unless Thomas can fast-track them).
> 
> Yeah, if it were fast tracked as a fix for 6.18, we could either use
> that tag as the base for kbuild-next (as we have not take any patches
> for 6.19 yet) or if they are 6.19 material, Thomas could provide us with
> a signed tag or stable shared branch so that we could take this for 6.19
> and have a clean tree. Whatever works.

Daniel has queued the clocksource fix for 6.19 now so I guess we can
just wait until both fixes hit mainline and either send this one to
Linus after that for -rc1 (or -rc2), or just wait until 6.20.

I'll send a reminder when both are in Linus's tree.
 
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>

Thanks for reviewing.

> >  scripts/mod/modpost.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> > index 47c8aa2a6939..5c499dace0bb 100644
> > --- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> > +++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> > @@ -953,7 +953,7 @@ static int secref_whitelist(const char *fromsec, const char *fromsym,
> >  	/* symbols in data sections that may refer to any init/exit sections */
> >  	if (match(fromsec, PATTERNS(DATA_SECTIONS)) &&
> >  	    match(tosec, PATTERNS(ALL_INIT_SECTIONS, ALL_EXIT_SECTIONS)) &&
> > -	    match(fromsym, PATTERNS("*_ops", "*_probe", "*_console")))
> > +	    match(fromsym, PATTERNS("*_ops", "*_console")))
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> >  	/* Check for pattern 3 */
> > -- 
> > 2.49.1
> > 

Johan

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-20  9:16 [PATCH] modpost: drop '*_probe' from section check whitelist Johan Hovold
2025-10-21  0:20 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-22 20:39 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-11-12 16:48   ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-11-14  4:16     ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-11-14  8:45       ` Johan Hovold
2025-12-16  1:11       ` Johan Hovold
2025-11-15 15:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-12-16 13:13 ` Nathan Chancellor
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-20 15:52 kernel test robot
2025-10-30 10:03 kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aRS6VQCKB7dXGbXx@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.schier@linux.dev \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.