From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: mm: Prevent a TLB shutdown on initial uniquification
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 15:20:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRSXxKacvz4h9_Th@alpha.franken.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2511121046350.25436@angie.orcam.me.uk>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 12:16:28PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2025, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
>
> > > Can you try the diagnostic patch below, which is what I used to verify
> > > this change, and report the entries produced? Otherwise I wonder whether
> > > I haven't missed a barrier somewhere.
> >
> > Update on the issue: Your patch is good and the segmentation faults,
> > I'm seeing, have IMHO a different reason. Instead of removing the call
> > to r4k_tlb_uniquify() I've replaced the jal in the binary with a nop.
> > And the issue is still there with this patched kernel. I've seen
> > something similair on a R12k Octanes, which comes and goes probably
> > depeding on code layout. So far I wasn't able to nail this down :-(
>
> Oh dear! Something to do with the cache? Or code alignment perhaps?
code alignment is probably the trigger. It's reproducible on an R4400SC
and R5000 Indy, but not on a R4000SC Indy. Main difference other than
clock speed is L1 cache size...
And I've missremembered the R12k Octane problem. It's not a segmentation
fault but a bus error, because of an illegal instruction. I tracked it
down to a incorrect data in I-Cache (all 0 cache line, iirc), but never
found the reason for that.
> > Do you want to send a v2 of the patch ? I'm fine with the current version
> > for applying...
>
> I'll send v2 with an update for the Wired register as we talked. It may
> take a day or two.
no problem, thank you.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-11 6:21 [PATCH] MIPS: mm: Prevent a TLB shutdown on initial uniquification Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-11-11 12:27 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2025-11-11 15:41 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-11-11 22:53 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2025-11-12 9:56 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2025-11-12 12:16 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-11-12 14:20 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer [this message]
2025-11-12 23:47 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-11-11 22:17 ` Nick Bowler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRSXxKacvz4h9_Th@alpha.franken.de \
--to=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=nbowler@draconx.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.