All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Mastro <amastro@fb.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] vfio: selftests: update DMA mapping tests to use queried IOVA ranges
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 13:31:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRT8v4Yj8Lm5KlUk@devgpu015.cco6.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112083005.542e0b7f.alex@shazbot.org>

On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 08:30:05AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:48:23 -0800
> Alex Mastro <amastro@fb.com> wrote:
> 
> > Not all IOMMUs support the same virtual address width as the processor,
> > for instance older Intel consumer platforms only support 39-bits of
> > IOMMU address space. On such platforms, using the virtual address as the
> > IOVA and mappings at the top of the address space both fail.
> > 
> > VFIO and IOMMUFD have facilities for retrieving valid IOVA ranges,
> > VFIO_IOMMU_TYPE1_INFO_CAP_IOVA_RANGE and IOMMU_IOAS_IOVA_RANGES,
> > respectively. These provide compatible arrays of ranges from which we
> > can construct a simple allocator.
> > 
> > Use this new allocator in place of reusing the virtual address, and
> > incorporate the maximum supported IOVA into the limit testing.  This
> > latter change doesn't test quite the same absolute end-of-address space
> > behavior but still seems to have some value.
> > 
> > This series is based on Alex Williamson's "Incorporate IOVA range info"
> > [1] along with feedback from the discussion in David Matlack's "Skip
> > vfio_dma_map_limit_test if mapping returns -EINVAL" [2].
> > 
> > Given David's plans to split IOMMU concerns from devices as described
> > in [3], this series' home for `struct iova_allocator` and IOVA
> > range helpers are likely to be short lived, since they reside in
> > vfio_pci_device.c. I assume that the rework can move this functionality
> > to a more appropriate location next to other IOMMU-focused code, once
> > such a place exists.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251108212954.26477-1-alex@shazbot.org/#t
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251107222058.2009244-1-dmatlack@google.com/
> > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aRIoKJk0uwLD-yGr@google.com/
> > 
> > To: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
> > To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> > To: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
> > To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> > Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Mastro <amastro@fb.com>
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Update capability chain cycle detection
> > - Clarify the iova=vaddr commit message
> > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251111-iova-ranges-v2-0-0fa267ff9b78@fb.com
> 
> Applied to vfio for-linus branch for v6.18.  Thanks for the quick
> resolution on this!

No problem, thanks for the reviews!

> 
> Alex

      reply	other threads:[~2025-11-12 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-11 18:48 [PATCH v3 0/4] vfio: selftests: update DMA mapping tests to use queried IOVA ranges Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] vfio: selftests: add iova range query helpers Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] vfio: selftests: fix map limit tests to use last available iova Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] vfio: selftests: add iova allocator Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 18:48 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] vfio: selftests: replace iova=vaddr with allocated iovas Alex Mastro
2025-11-11 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] vfio: selftests: update DMA mapping tests to use queried IOVA ranges David Matlack
2025-11-12 17:39   ` Alex Mastro
2025-11-12 17:51     ` David Matlack
2025-11-12 18:04       ` Alex Mastro
2025-11-12 15:30 ` Alex Williamson
2025-11-12 21:31   ` Alex Mastro [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aRT8v4Yj8Lm5KlUk@devgpu015.cco6.facebook.com \
    --to=amastro@fb.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.