From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <joro@8bytes.org>, <afael@kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
<alex@shazbot.org>, <jgg@nvidia.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>, <pjaroszynski@nvidia.com>,
<vsethi@nvidia.com>, <helgaas@kernel.org>, <etzhao1900@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_driver_get_domain_for_dev() helper
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:41:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRTGwJ2CABOIKtq6@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d5445875-76bd-453d-b959-25989f5d3060@linux.intel.com>
Hi Baolu,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 01:58:51PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 11/11/25 13:12, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * iommu_get_domain_for_dev() - Return the DMA API domain pointer
> > + * @dev - Device to query
> > + *
> > + * This function can be called within a driver bound to dev. The returned
> > + * pointer is valid for the lifetime of the bound driver.
> > + *
> > + * It should not be called by drivers with driver_managed_dma = true.
>
> "driver_managed_dma != true" means the driver will use the default
> domain allocated by the iommu core during iommu probe.
Hmm, I am not very sure. Jason's remarks pointed out that There
is an exception in host1x_client_iommu_detach():
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250924191055.GJ2617119@nvidia.com/
Where the group->domain could be NULL, i.e. not attached to the
default domain?
> The iommu core
> ensures that this domain stored at group->domain will not be changed
> during the driver's whole lifecycle. That's reasonable.
>
> How about making some code to enforce this requirement? Something like
> below ...
>
> > + */
> > struct iommu_domain *iommu_get_domain_for_dev(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > /* Caller must be a probed driver on dev */
> > @@ -2225,10 +2234,29 @@ struct iommu_domain *iommu_get_domain_for_dev(struct device *dev)
> > if (!group)
> > return NULL;
> > + lockdep_assert_not_held(&group->mutex);
>
> ...
> if (WARN_ON(!dev->driver || !group->owner_cnt || group->owner))
> return NULL;
With that, could host1x_client_iommu_detach() trigger WARN_ON?
Thanks!
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-11 5:12 [PATCH v5 0/5] Disable ATS via iommu during PCI resets Nicolin Chen
2025-11-11 5:12 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] iommu: Lock group->mutex in iommu_deferred_attach() Nicolin Chen
2025-11-12 2:47 ` Baolu Lu
2025-11-11 5:12 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] iommu: Tiny domain for iommu_setup_dma_ops() Nicolin Chen
2025-11-12 5:22 ` Baolu Lu
2025-11-14 9:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-11-14 9:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-11-11 5:12 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_driver_get_domain_for_dev() helper Nicolin Chen
2025-11-12 5:58 ` Baolu Lu
2025-11-12 17:41 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-11-18 7:02 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-19 2:47 ` Baolu Lu
2025-11-19 2:57 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-24 19:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-12 8:52 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-14 9:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-11-11 5:12 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] iommu: Introduce iommu_dev_reset_prepare() and iommu_dev_reset_done() Nicolin Chen
2025-11-12 6:18 ` Baolu Lu
2025-11-12 17:43 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-14 9:37 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-11-14 18:26 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-17 4:59 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-11-17 19:27 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-17 23:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-11 5:12 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] pci: Suspend iommu function prior to resetting a device Nicolin Chen
2025-11-14 9:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-11-14 18:00 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-17 4:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-11-17 19:26 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-18 0:29 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-11-18 1:42 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-18 5:38 ` Baolu Lu
2025-11-18 6:53 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-18 7:53 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-11-18 8:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-17 22:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-18 8:16 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRTGwJ2CABOIKtq6@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=afael@kernel.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=etzhao1900@gmail.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pjaroszynski@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.