From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACE99CD4F49 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 05:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1162250.1489963 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1vJmMd-0001rp-N4; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 05:28:51 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1162250.1489963; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 05:28:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1vJmMd-0001ri-JX; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 05:28:51 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1162250; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 05:28:49 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1vJmMb-0001rc-Qj for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 05:28:49 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vJmMa-006cLd-1r; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 05:28:48 +0000 Received: from [19.12.91.86] (helo=localhost) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vJmMa-00BKr8-0M; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 05:28:48 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID :Subject:Cc:To:Date:From; bh=vxNJy7MkJ6d7LxT0937y6yDKSFpnnsf4IHgaPtz8594=; b= JILh3frBLAN1GO7Vt991hq8/DneD3lFYop1Guqi+8OzbvxRiZP2IxUAYcbNI4EqU/9YkpyBJb8QQy FycIj1mVx9IDM+gml5FewHh6f/BfX2ZAorTzAAsMaA8FlDXd/E8BzF/694D3e4qSrKNsr7nQncbu4 e5kw1pYdr3gkZWLMM=; From: dmukhin@xen.org Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 21:28:47 -0800 To: Mykola Kvach Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, anthony.perard@vates.tech, jbeulich@suse.com, julien@xen.org, michal.orzel@amd.com, roger.pau@citrix.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, dmukhin@ford.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/16] emul/ns16x50: implement emulator stub Message-ID: References: <20250908211149.279143-1-dmukhin@ford.com> <20250908211149.279143-4-dmukhin@ford.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 01:16:26PM +0300, Mykola Kvach wrote: > > +/* > > + * Virtual ns16x50 device state. > > + */ > > +struct vuart_ns16x50 { > > + uint8_t regs[NS16X50_EMU_REGS_NUM]; /* Emulated registers */ > > I think it would be better to add an init procedure for the registers. > At least not all bits in all registers should be initialized to zero. > Or will this be handled in some way during I/O reads? I can do it, something like ns16x50_reset() should work I think. Thanks for suggestion!