All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
	Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 11/27] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 18:25:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aS1tLp7tBi8K_NWk@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADUfDZqtoN=Xv17txG5cZ9foD3ToxgiiW_DSgnABG2ocK7p-UQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 08:39:49AM -0800, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 5:59 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS by walking the uring_cmd fixed buffer:
> >
> > - read each element into one temp buffer in batch style
> >
> > - parse and apply each element for committing io result
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/block/ublk_drv.c      | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h |   8 +++
> >  2 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > index 66c77daae955..ea992366af5b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > @@ -2098,9 +2098,9 @@ static inline int ublk_set_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_io *io, struct io_uring_cmd
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_io *io,
> > -                                   struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> > -                                   u16 *buf_idx)
> > +static void __ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_io *io,
> > +                                      struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> > +                                      u16 *buf_idx)
> 
> The name could be a bit more descriptive. How about "ublk_clear_auto_buf_reg()"?

Looks fine.

> 
> >  {
> >         if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_AUTO_BUF_REG) {
> >                 io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_AUTO_BUF_REG;
> > @@ -2118,7 +2118,13 @@ static int ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_io *io,
> >                 if (io->buf_ctx_handle == io_uring_cmd_ctx_handle(cmd))
> >                         *buf_idx = io->buf.auto_reg.index;
> >         }
> > +}
> >
> > +static int ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_io *io,
> > +                                   struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> > +                                   u16 *buf_idx)
> > +{
> > +       __ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(io, cmd, buf_idx);
> >         return ublk_set_auto_buf_reg(io, cmd);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -2553,6 +2559,17 @@ static inline __u64 ublk_batch_buf_addr(const struct ublk_batch_io *uc,
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline __u64 ublk_batch_zone_lba(const struct ublk_batch_io *uc,
> > +                                       const struct ublk_elem_header *elem)
> > +{
> > +       const void *buf = (const void *)elem;
> 
> Unnecessary cast

OK

> 
> > +
> > +       if (uc->flags & UBLK_BATCH_F_HAS_ZONE_LBA)
> > +               return *(__u64 *)(buf + sizeof(*elem) +
> > +                               8 * !!(uc->flags & UBLK_BATCH_F_HAS_BUF_ADDR));
> 
> Cast to a const pointer?

OK, but I feel it isn't necessary.

> 
> 
> > +       return -1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct ublk_auto_buf_reg
> >  ublk_batch_auto_buf_reg(const struct ublk_batch_io *uc,
> >                         const struct ublk_elem_header *elem)
> > @@ -2708,6 +2725,98 @@ static int ublk_handle_batch_prep_cmd(const struct ublk_batch_io_data *data)
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int ublk_batch_commit_io_check(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> > +                                     struct ublk_io *io,
> > +                                     union ublk_io_buf *buf)
> > +{
> > +       struct request *req = io->req;
> > +
> > +       if (!req)
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> 
> This check seems redundant with the UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV check?

I'd keep the check, which has document benefit, or warn_on()?

> 
> > +
> > +       if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE)
> > +               return -EBUSY;
> 
> Aren't UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE and UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV mutually
> exclusive? Then this check is also redundant with the
> UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV check.

OK.

> 
> > +
> > +       if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       if (ublk_need_map_io(ubq)) {
> > +               /*
> > +                * COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ has to provide IO buffer if
> > +                * NEED GET DATA is not enabled or it is Read IO.
> > +                */
> > +               if (!buf->addr && (!ublk_need_get_data(ubq) ||
> > +                                       req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ))
> > +                       return -EINVAL;
> > +       }
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ublk_batch_commit_io(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> > +                               const struct ublk_batch_io_data *data,
> > +                               const struct ublk_elem_header *elem)
> > +{
> > +       struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[elem->tag];
> > +       const struct ublk_batch_io *uc = &data->header;
> > +       u16 buf_idx = UBLK_INVALID_BUF_IDX;
> > +       union ublk_io_buf buf = { 0 };
> > +       struct request *req = NULL;
> > +       bool auto_reg = false;
> > +       bool compl = false;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       if (ublk_dev_support_auto_buf_reg(data->ub)) {
> > +               buf.auto_reg = ublk_batch_auto_buf_reg(uc, elem);
> > +               auto_reg = true;
> > +       } else if (ublk_dev_need_map_io(data->ub))
> > +               buf.addr = ublk_batch_buf_addr(uc, elem);
> > +
> > +       ublk_io_lock(io);
> > +       ret = ublk_batch_commit_io_check(ubq, io, &buf);
> > +       if (!ret) {
> > +               io->res = elem->result;
> > +               io->buf = buf;
> > +               req = ublk_fill_io_cmd(io, data->cmd);
> > +
> > +               if (auto_reg)
> > +                       __ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(io, data->cmd, &buf_idx);
> > +               compl = ublk_need_complete_req(data->ub, io);
> > +       }
> > +       ublk_io_unlock(io);
> > +
> > +       if (unlikely(ret)) {
> > +               pr_warn("%s: dev %u queue %u io %u: commit failure %d\n",
> > +                       __func__, data->ub->dev_info.dev_id, ubq->q_id,
> > +                       elem->tag, ret);
> 
> This warning can be triggered by userspace. It should probably be
> rate-limited or changed to pr_devel().

Looks fine.



Thanks, 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-01 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-21  1:58 [PATCH V4 00/27] ublk: add UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 01/27] kfifo: add kfifo_alloc_node() helper for NUMA awareness Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:12   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01  1:46     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01  5:58       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 02/27] ublk: add parameter `struct io_uring_cmd *` to ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg() Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 03/27] ublk: add `union ublk_io_buf` with improved naming Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 04/27] ublk: refactor auto buffer register in ublk_dispatch_req() Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 05/27] ublk: pass const pointer to ublk_queue_is_zoned() Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 06/27] ublk: add helper of __ublk_fetch() Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 07/27] ublk: define ublk_ch_batch_io_fops for the coming feature F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 08/27] ublk: prepare for not tracking task context for command batch Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 09/27] ublk: add new batch command UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS & UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:19   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 10/27] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:47   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-30 19:25   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 11/27] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-30 16:39   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 10:25     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-12-01 16:43       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 12/27] ublk: add io events fifo structure Ming Lei
2025-11-30 16:53   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01  3:04     ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 13/27] ublk: add batch I/O dispatch infrastructure Ming Lei
2025-11-30 19:24   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-30 21:37     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01  2:32     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 17:37       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 14/27] ublk: add UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_IO_CMDS for batch I/O processing Ming Lei
2025-12-01  5:55   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01  9:41     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 17:51       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02  1:27         ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02  1:39           ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02  8:14             ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 15:20               ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 15/27] ublk: abort requests filled in event kfifo Ming Lei
2025-12-01 18:52   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02  1:29     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 19:00   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 16/27] ublk: add new feature UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-12-01 21:16   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02  1:44     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 16:05       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03  2:21         ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 17/27] ublk: document " Ming Lei
2025-12-01 21:46   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02  1:55     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02  2:03     ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 18/27] ublk: implement batch request completion via blk_mq_end_request_batch() Ming Lei
2025-12-01 21:55   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 19/27] selftests: ublk: fix user_data truncation for tgt_data >= 256 Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 20/27] selftests: ublk: replace assert() with ublk_assert() Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 21/27] selftests: ublk: add ublk_io_buf_idx() for returning io buffer index Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 22/27] selftests: ublk: add batch buffer management infrastructure Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 23/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 24/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 25/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 26/27] selftests: ublk: add --batch/-b for enabling F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 27/27] selftests: ublk: support arbitrary threads/queues combination Ming Lei
2025-11-28 11:59 ` [PATCH V4 00/27] ublk: add UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-28 16:19   ` Jens Axboe
2025-11-28 19:07     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-29  1:24       ` Ming Lei
2025-11-28 16:22 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aS1tLp7tBi8K_NWk@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefani@seibold.net \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.