All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@vates.tech>,
	Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] symbols/x86: don't use symbols-dummy
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 18:36:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSXpJ3yqSWfNgElC@Mac.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3618c458-d9ec-4cc6-a800-0741ade461a1@suse.com>

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 03:14:27PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> In particular when linking with lld, which converts hidden symbols to
> local ones, the ELF symbol table can change in unhelpful ways between the
> first two linking passes, resulting in the .rodata contributions to change
> between the 2nd and 3rd pass. That, however, renders our embedded symbol
> table pretty much unusable; the recently introduced self-test may then
> also fail. (Another difference between compiling a C file and assembling
> the generated ones is that - with -fdata-sections in use - the .rodata
> contributions move between passes 1 and 2, when we'd prefer them not to.)
> 
> Make tools/symbols capable of producing an "empty" assembly file, such
> that unwanted differences between passes 1 and 2 go away when then using
> the corresponding objects in place of common/symbols-dummy.o.
> 
> Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> Reported-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

LGTM, not sure whether you want to extend to other arches in this
same patch, or simply guard the build of symbols-dummy.o for non-x86
arches.

> ---
> May want mirroring to other arch-es.
> 
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile
> @@ -134,8 +134,10 @@ $(TARGET): $(TARGET)-syms $(efi-y) $(obj
>  CFLAGS-$(XEN_BUILD_EFI) += -DXEN_BUILD_EFI
>  
>  $(TARGET)-syms: $(objtree)/prelink.o $(obj)/xen.lds
> +	$(objtree)/tools/symbols $(all_symbols) --empty > $(dot-target).0.S
> +	$(MAKE) $(build)=$(@D) $(dot-target).0.o
>  	$(LD) $(XEN_LDFLAGS) -T $(obj)/xen.lds $< $(build_id_linker) \
> -	    $(objtree)/common/symbols-dummy.o -o $(dot-target).0

It would be good if we could now stop building symbols-dummy.o as part
of extra-y.  Maybe you could guard it with ifneq ($(CONFIG_X86),y) in
the Makefile?

Or otherwise remove this from all arches thus removing
common/symbols-dummy.c.

> +	      $(dot-target).0.o -o $(dot-target).0
>  	$(NM) -pa --format=sysv $(dot-target).0 \
>  		| $(objtree)/tools/symbols $(all_symbols) --sysv --sort \
>  		> $(dot-target).1.S
> @@ -207,9 +209,11 @@ $(TARGET).efi: $(objtree)/prelink.o $(no
>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO),y)
>  	$(if $(filter --strip-debug,$(EFI_LDFLAGS)),echo,:) "Will strip debug info from $(@F)"
>  endif
> +	$(objtree)/tools/symbols $(all_symbols) --empty > $(dot-target).0s.S
> +	$(MAKE) $(build)=$(@D) .$(@F).0s.o
>  	$(foreach base, $(VIRT_BASE) $(ALT_BASE), \
>  	          $(LD) $(call EFI_LDFLAGS,$(base)) -T $(obj)/efi.lds $< $(relocs-dummy) \
> -	                $(objtree)/common/symbols-dummy.o $(note_file_option) \
> +	                $(dot-target).0s.o $(note_file_option) \
>  	                -o $(dot-target).$(base).0 &&) :
>  	$(MKRELOC) $(foreach base,$(VIRT_BASE) $(ALT_BASE),$(dot-target).$(base).0) \
>  		> $(dot-target).1r.S
> --- a/xen/tools/symbols.c
> +++ b/xen/tools/symbols.c
> @@ -672,7 +672,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  				warn_dup = true;
>  			else if (strcmp(argv[i], "--error-dup") == 0)
>  				warn_dup = error_dup = true;
> -			else if (strcmp(argv[i], "--xensyms") == 0)
> +			else if (strcmp(argv[i], "--empty") == 0) {
> +				write_src();
> +				return 0;

Oh, that was easier than I was expecting for symbols to generate a
working empty assembly file.

Thanks, Roger.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-25 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-25 14:12 [PATCH 0/2] symbols/x86: avoid symbols-dummy Jan Beulich
2025-11-25 14:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] symbols/x86: re-number intermediate files Jan Beulich
2025-11-25 17:24   ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-11-25 14:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] symbols/x86: don't use symbols-dummy Jan Beulich
2025-11-25 17:36   ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2025-11-26  6:21     ` Jan Beulich
2025-11-26  8:21       ` Roger Pau Monné

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aSXpJ3yqSWfNgElC@Mac.lan \
    --to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@vates.tech \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=michal.orzel@amd.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.