From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: "Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen" <ast@fiberby.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
"Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Yuyang Huang <yuyanghuang@google.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netlink: specs: add big-endian byte-order for u32 IPv4 addresses
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 06:36:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSaf1D-N5ONmnys8@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8564b02f-18f9-4132-ab69-5ee1babeb18c@fiberby.net>
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 05:03:13PM +0000, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:
> I also checked how consistently defined the fields using the ipv6 display helper are,
> and it looks like they could use some realignment too. Obviously not for this fix.
>
> git grep -C6 'display-hint.*ipv6$' Documentation/netlink/specs/
The ip6gre spec shows
-
name: local
display-hint: ipv6
-
name: remote
display-hint: ipv6
The dump result looks good. So for others ipv6 field, what alignment should we
use? Should we add checks: min-len: 16? Do we need byte-order: big-endian?
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-26 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 11:20 [PATCH net-next] netlink: specs: add big-endian byte-order for u32 IPv4 addresses Hangbin Liu
2025-11-25 17:03 ` Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2025-11-26 6:36 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-11-26 13:32 ` Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
2025-11-27 2:14 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-11-27 3:31 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-11-27 1:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aSaf1D-N5ONmnys8@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@fiberby.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=yuyanghuang@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.