Re: [rft, PATCH v1 1/1] cpumask: Don't use "proxy" headers

[Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 09:59:16AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 12:42:23AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 04:17:51PM -0500, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 09:39:59PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > > > Not fully compile tested, might give some compilation errors
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > -#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> > > > -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > 
> > > I recall, removing kernel.h from cpumasks was a troublesome exercise
> > > back then. But it may be my false memory.
> > 
> > Yeah, there are several headers that are too tangled together.
> > At least it builds on my configurations on x86_64.
> > 
> > > Added this for testing in bitmap-for-next.
> > 
> > Thanks, let's see how it will go. But note that it might fall the builds in
> > some cases.
> 
> So, we survived already a couple of Linux Next integration builds, I believe
> we are quite okay with this change and if anything appears, it can be fixed
> in a followups.

Yeah. I'll just keep the patch in my branch, so hopefully it will land
in mainline in the next merge cycle.

Thanks,
Yury