From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: pratyush@kernel.org, dmatlack@google.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] liveupdate: luo_core: fix redundant bound check in luo_ioctl()
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 11:38:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSwQnOF0T64i2ljF@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251130010919.1488230-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 08:09:19PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> The kernel test robot reported a Smatch warning:
> kernel/liveupdate/luo_core.c:402 luo_ioctl() warn: unsigned 'nr' is
> never less than zero.
>
> This occurs because 'nr' is unsigned and LIVEUPDATE_CMD_BASE is
> currently defined as 0, making the check (nr < LIVEUPDATE_CMD_BASE)
> always false.
>
> Remove the explicit lower bound check. The logic remains correct because
> 'nr' is unsigned; if nr is less than LIVEUPDATE_CMD_BASE, the expression
> (nr - LIVEUPDATE_CMD_BASE) will wrap around to a large positive value.
> This will inevitably be larger than ARRAY_SIZE(luo_ioctl_ops) and be
> caught by the upper bound check.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511280300.6pvBmXUS-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/liveupdate/luo_core.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_core.c b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_core.c
> index 69298d82f404..7a9ef16b37d8 100644
> --- a/kernel/liveupdate/luo_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/luo_core.c
> @@ -404,10 +404,8 @@ static long luo_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> int err;
>
> nr = _IOC_NR(cmd);
> - if (nr < LIVEUPDATE_CMD_BASE ||
> - (nr - LIVEUPDATE_CMD_BASE) >= ARRAY_SIZE(luo_ioctl_ops)) {
> + if (nr - LIVEUPDATE_CMD_BASE >= ARRAY_SIZE(luo_ioctl_ops))
> return -EINVAL;
> - }
>
> ucmd.ubuffer = (void __user *)arg;
> err = get_user(ucmd.user_size, (u32 __user *)ucmd.ubuffer);
>
> base-commit: 7d31f578f3230f3b7b33b0930b08f9afd8429817
> --
> 2.52.0.487.g5c8c507ade-goog
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-30 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-30 1:09 [PATCH] liveupdate: luo_core: fix redundant bound check in luo_ioctl() Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-30 9:38 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-11-30 22:53 ` Pratyush Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aSwQnOF0T64i2ljF@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.