From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/50] drm/i915/dp: Factor out align_max_vesa_compressed_bpp_x16()
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:24:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aT_97grvzvX0J905@ideak-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20c7439d3635514785e107b589569e659938f5d4.camel@coelho.fi>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 02:08:04PM +0200, Luca Coelho wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-12-15 at 14:00 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 09:49:45AM +0200, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2025-11-27 at 19:49 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > Factor out align_max_vesa_compressed_bpp_x16(), also used later for
> > > > computing the maximum DSC compressed BPP limit.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 35 ++++++++++++++-----------
> > > > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > > index dcb9bc11e677b..3111758578d6c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > > @@ -867,10 +867,23 @@ small_joiner_ram_size_bits(struct intel_display *display)
> > > > return 6144 * 8;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static int align_max_vesa_compressed_bpp_x16(int max_link_bpp_x16)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int i;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_bpp) - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > > > + int vesa_bpp_x16 = fxp_q4_from_int(valid_dsc_bpp[i]);
> > >
> > > Any reason why you're doing the loop from the end to the beginning,
> > > instead of the more natural from 0 to the end?
> >
> > Yes. The values in valid_dsc_bpp[] are stored in increasing order, so to
> > find the maximum value <= the passed-in limit, the natural iteration
> > order is from the end of the array.
>
> I don't really see how this affects anything functionally and by
> "natural" I meant for the person reading the code. I had to think a
> bit deeper when reviewing this loop because it's not the "for (i = 0; i
> < ARRAY_SIZE(...); i++)" format I'm mostly used to.
Yes, I also meant more natural from the reviewer POV. The forward
iteration wouldn't be obvious for three reasons: it iterates only
through ARRAY_SIZE()-1 elements not ARRAY_SIZE elemts, in iteration "i"
it must check the array element at index i+1 not at index i and it also
depends an extra check outside of the loop to return 0 if even the first
element of the array is above the passed-in limit.
> Anyway, another nitpick with not functional issues, so:
>
> Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Luca.
>
>
>
> > > I think this is clearer and less prone to mistakes:
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_bpp); i++) {...}
> > >
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > + if (vesa_bpp_x16 <= max_link_bpp_x16)
> > > > + return vesa_bpp_x16;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static u32 intel_dp_dsc_nearest_valid_bpp(struct intel_display *display, u32 bpp, u32 pipe_bpp)
> > > > {
> > > > u32 bits_per_pixel = bpp;
> > > > - int i;
> > > >
> > > > /* Error out if the max bpp is less than smallest allowed valid bpp */
> > > > if (bits_per_pixel < valid_dsc_bpp[0]) {
> > > > @@ -899,15 +912,13 @@ static u32 intel_dp_dsc_nearest_valid_bpp(struct intel_display *display, u32 bpp
> > > > }
> > > > bits_per_pixel = min_t(u32, bits_per_pixel, 27);
> > > > } else {
> > > > + int link_bpp_x16 = fxp_q4_from_int(bits_per_pixel);
> > > > +
> > > > /* Find the nearest match in the array of known BPPs from VESA */
> > > > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_bpp) - 1; i++) {
> > > > - if (bits_per_pixel < valid_dsc_bpp[i + 1])
> > > > - break;
> > > > - }
> > > > - drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Set dsc bpp from %d to VESA %d\n",
> > > > - bits_per_pixel, valid_dsc_bpp[i]);
> > > > + link_bpp_x16 = align_max_vesa_compressed_bpp_x16(link_bpp_x16);
> > > >
> > > > - bits_per_pixel = valid_dsc_bpp[i];
> > > > + drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, fxp_q4_to_frac(link_bpp_x16));
> > > > + bits_per_pixel = fxp_q4_to_int(link_bpp_x16);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > return bits_per_pixel;
> > > > @@ -2219,7 +2230,6 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_bpp_step_x16(const struct intel_connector *connector)
> > > > bool intel_dp_dsc_valid_compressed_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int bpp_x16)
> > > > {
> > > > struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> > > > - int i;
> > > >
> > > > if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 13) {
> > > > if (intel_dp->force_dsc_fractional_bpp_en && !fxp_q4_to_frac(bpp_x16))
> > > > @@ -2231,12 +2241,7 @@ bool intel_dp_dsc_valid_compressed_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int bpp_x16)
> > > > if (fxp_q4_to_frac(bpp_x16))
> > > > return false;
> > > >
> > > > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_bpp); i++) {
> > > > - if (fxp_q4_to_int(bpp_x16) == valid_dsc_bpp[i])
> > > > - return true;
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > > - return false;
> > > > + return align_max_vesa_compressed_bpp_x16(bpp_x16) == bpp_x16;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 147+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-27 17:49 [PATCH 00/50] drm/i915/dp: Clean up link BW/DSC slice config computation Imre Deak
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 01/50] drm/dp: Parse all DSC slice count caps for eDP 1.5 Imre Deak
2025-12-08 11:24 ` Luca Coelho
2025-12-08 12:36 ` Imre Deak
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 02/50] drm/dp: Add drm_dp_dsc_sink_slice_count_mask() Imre Deak
2025-12-09 8:48 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 03/50] drm/i915/dp: Fix DSC sink's slice count capability check Imre Deak
2025-12-09 8:51 ` Luca Coelho
2025-12-09 9:53 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-09 11:14 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 04/50] drm/i915/dp: Return a fixed point BPP value from intel_dp_output_bpp() Imre Deak
2025-12-09 9:10 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 05/50] drm/i915/dp: Use a mode's crtc_clock vs. clock during state computation Imre Deak
2025-12-09 12:51 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 06/50] drm/i915/dp: Factor out intel_dp_link_bw_overhead() Imre Deak
2025-12-09 12:52 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 07/50] drm/i915/dp: Fix BW check in is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config() Imre Deak
2025-12-09 12:53 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 08/50] drm/i915/dp: Use the effective data rate for DP BW calculation Imre Deak
2025-12-10 12:48 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 09/50] drm/i915/dp: Use the effective data rate for DP compressed " Imre Deak
2025-12-10 12:50 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 10/50] drm/i915/dp: Account with MST, SSC BW overhead for uncompressed DP-MST stream BW Imre Deak
2025-12-10 13:08 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 11/50] drm/i915/dp: Account with DSC BW overhead for compressed DP-SST " Imre Deak
2025-12-10 13:39 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 12/50] drm/i915/dp: Account with pipe joiner max compressed BPP limit for DP-MST and eDP Imre Deak
2025-12-10 14:29 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 13/50] drm/i915/dp: Drop unused timeslots param from dsc_compute_link_config() Imre Deak
2025-12-10 14:31 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 14/50] drm/i915/dp: Factor out align_max_sink_dsc_input_bpp() Imre Deak
2025-12-12 15:41 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-12-15 7:46 ` Luca Coelho
2025-12-15 11:53 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-15 12:02 ` Luca Coelho
2025-12-15 12:33 ` Imre Deak
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 15/50] drm/i915/dp: Factor out align_max_vesa_compressed_bpp_x16() Imre Deak
2025-12-12 15:46 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-12-15 7:49 ` Luca Coelho
2025-12-15 12:00 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-15 12:08 ` Luca Coelho
2025-12-15 12:24 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 16/50] drm/i915/dp: Fail state computation for invalid min/max link BPP values Imre Deak
2025-12-12 15:48 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-12-15 7:51 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 17/50] drm/i915/dp: Fail state computation for invalid max throughput BPP value Imre Deak
2025-12-12 15:51 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-12-15 7:51 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 18/50] drm/i915/dp: Fail state computation for invalid max sink compressed " Imre Deak
2025-12-12 15:52 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-12-15 7:52 ` Luca Coelho
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 19/50] drm/i915/dp: Fail state computation for invalid DSC source input BPP values Imre Deak
2025-12-11 8:29 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 20/50] drm/i915/dp: Align min/max DSC input BPPs to sink caps Imre Deak
2025-12-11 8:51 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 21/50] drm/i915/dp: Align min/max compressed BPPs when calculating BPP limits Imre Deak
2025-12-12 9:17 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-12-12 11:09 ` Imre Deak
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 22/50] drm/i915/dp: Drop intel_dp parameter from intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits() Imre Deak
2025-12-12 9:23 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 23/50] drm/i915/dp: Pass intel_output_format to intel_dp_dsc_sink_{min_max}_compressed_bpp() Imre Deak
2025-12-12 9:27 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 24/50] drm/i915/dp: Pass mode clock to dsc_throughput_quirk_max_bpp_x16() Imre Deak
2025-12-12 9:31 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 25/50] drm/i915/dp: Factor out compute_min_compressed_bpp_x16() Imre Deak
2025-12-12 9:39 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-12-12 11:01 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-12 11:41 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:49 ` [PATCH 26/50] drm/i915/dp: Factor out compute_max_compressed_bpp_x16() Imre Deak
2025-12-12 9:50 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 27/50] drm/i915/dp: Add intel_dp_mode_valid_with_dsc() Imre Deak
2025-12-12 11:43 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 28/50] drm/i915/dp: Unify detect and compute time DSC mode BW validation Imre Deak
2025-12-12 14:29 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 29/50] drm/i915/dp: Use helpers to align min/max compressed BPPs Imre Deak
2025-12-12 14:34 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-12-12 14:39 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 30/50] drm/i915/dp: Simplify computing DSC BPPs for eDP Imre Deak
2025-12-12 14:45 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 31/50] drm/i915/dp: Simplify computing DSC BPPs for DP-SST Imre Deak
2025-12-12 14:59 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-12-12 18:41 ` Imre Deak
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 32/50] drm/i915/dp: Simplify computing forced DSC BPP " Imre Deak
2025-12-12 15:21 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 33/50] drm/i915/dp: Unify computing compressed BPP for DP-SST and eDP Imre Deak
2025-12-12 15:38 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 34/50] drm/i915/dp: Simplify eDP vs. DP compressed BPP computation Imre Deak
2025-12-12 15:39 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 35/50] drm/i915/dp: Simplify computing the DSC compressed BPP for DP-MST Imre Deak
2025-12-08 13:08 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 36/50] drm/i915/dsc: Track the detaild DSC slice configuration Imre Deak
2025-12-09 8:24 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 37/50] drm/i915/dsc: Track the DSC stream count in the DSC slice config state Imre Deak
2025-12-09 8:28 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 38/50] drm/i915/dsi: Move initialization of DSI DSC streams-per-pipe to fill_dsc() Imre Deak
2025-12-09 8:47 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-12-09 10:38 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-09 11:37 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 39/50] drm/i915/dsi: Track the detailed DSC slice configuration Imre Deak
2025-12-09 12:43 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 40/50] drm/i915/dp: " Imre Deak
2025-12-09 14:06 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-12-09 14:30 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-09 17:50 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 41/50] drm/i915/dsc: Switch to using intel_dsc_line_slice_count() Imre Deak
2025-12-09 17:14 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 42/50] drm/i915/dp: Factor out intel_dp_dsc_min_slice_count() Imre Deak
2025-12-09 17:26 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 43/50] drm/i915/dp: Use int for DSC slice count variables Imre Deak
2025-12-09 17:30 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 44/50] drm/i915/dp: Rename test_slice_count to slices_per_line Imre Deak
2025-12-09 17:34 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 45/50] drm/i915/dp: Simplify the DSC slice config loop's slices-per-pipe iteration Imre Deak
2025-12-10 12:38 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 46/50] drm/i915/dsc: Add intel_dsc_get_slice_config() Imre Deak
2025-12-10 14:06 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 47/50] drm/i915/dsi: Use intel_dsc_get_slice_config() Imre Deak
2025-12-10 14:44 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 48/50] drm/i915/dp: Unify DP and eDP slice count computation Imre Deak
2025-12-11 6:48 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 49/50] drm/i915/dp: Add intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_config() Imre Deak
2025-12-11 6:55 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-12-11 9:52 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-12 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2025-12-15 6:06 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-11-27 17:50 ` [PATCH 50/50] drm/i915/dp: Use intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_config() Imre Deak
2025-12-11 6:59 ` Hogander, Jouni
2025-12-11 10:23 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-12 18:03 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-12 18:17 ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2025-11-27 20:28 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/dp: Clean up link BW/DSC slice config computation Patchwork
2025-11-27 20:29 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-11-27 20:44 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-11-27 21:47 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-11-27 23:11 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-11-28 16:20 ` [CI 09/50] drm/i915/dp: Use the effective data rate for DP compressed BW calculation Imre Deak
2025-12-12 13:23 ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2025-11-28 18:48 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/dp: Clean up link BW/DSC slice config computation Patchwork
2025-11-28 20:49 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-01 9:46 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-12-12 20:01 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: Clean up link BW/DSC slice config computation (rev3) Patchwork
2025-12-12 20:45 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-12-12 20:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-12 21:01 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-12-12 22:03 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-12-13 4:00 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-12-13 16:47 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aT_97grvzvX0J905@ideak-desk \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=luca@coelho.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.