All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<joro@8bytes.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<skolothumtho@nvidia.com>, <praan@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v2 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-test: Add nested s1bypass/s1dssbypass coverage
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 13:04:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTiO69YZ9WA8dFe0@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f52c705d-6032-4d85-b902-dd6d0a40b9ec@linux.alibaba.com>

On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 11:43:41AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> Hi, Nicolin,
> 
> Nit. Instead of duplicating this code, we can leverage the existing
> arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste() helper here.

Thanks for the review. I squashed the following changes:

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c
index 1672e75ebffc2..197b8b55fe7a2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c
@@ -33,8 +33,12 @@ static struct mm_struct sva_mm = {
 enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat {
 	ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS = BIT(0),
 	ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_STALL = BIT(1),
+	ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED = BIT(2),
 };
 
+static void arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *ste,
+				      enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat feat);
+
 static bool arm_smmu_entry_differs_in_used_bits(const __le64 *entry,
 						const __le64 *used_bits,
 						const __le64 *target,
@@ -198,6 +202,17 @@ static void arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *ste,
 	};
 
 	arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(ste, &master, ats_enabled, s1dss);
+	if (feat & ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED) {
+		struct arm_smmu_ste s2ste;
+		int i;
+
+		arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2ste, ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS);
+		ste->data[0] |= cpu_to_le64(
+			FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_NESTED));
+		ste->data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_MEV);
+		for (i = 2; i < NUM_ENTRY_QWORDS; i++)
+			ste->data[i] = s2ste.data[i];
+	}
 }
 
 static void arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_bypass_to_abort(struct kunit *test)
@@ -555,46 +570,17 @@ static void arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_s2_to_s1_stall(struct kunit *test)
 						       NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(3));
 }
 
-static void arm_smmu_test_make_nested_cdtable_ste(
-	struct arm_smmu_ste *ste, unsigned int s1dss, const dma_addr_t dma_addr,
-	enum arm_smmu_test_master_feat feat)
-{
-	bool stall_enabled = feat & ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_STALL;
-	bool ats_enabled = feat & ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS;
-	struct arm_smmu_ste s1ste;
-
-	struct arm_smmu_master master = {
-		.ats_enabled = ats_enabled,
-		.cd_table.cdtab_dma = dma_addr,
-		.cd_table.s1cdmax = 0xFF,
-		.cd_table.s1fmt = STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_64K_L2,
-		.smmu = &smmu,
-		.stall_enabled = stall_enabled,
-	};
-
-	arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(ste, ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS);
-	arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(&s1ste, &master, ats_enabled, s1dss);
-
-	ste->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(
-		STRTAB_STE_0_V |
-		FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_NESTED));
-	ste->data[0] |= s1ste.data[0] & ~cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG);
-	ste->data[1] |= s1ste.data[1];
-	/* Merge events for DoS mitigations on eventq */
-	ste->data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_MEV);
-}
-
 static void
 arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_nested_s1dssbypass_to_s1bypass(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct arm_smmu_ste s1_ste;
 	struct arm_smmu_ste s2_ste;
 
-	arm_smmu_test_make_nested_cdtable_ste(&s1_ste,
-					      STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS,
-					      fake_cdtab_dma_addr,
-					      ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS);
+	arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste(
+		&s1_ste, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS, fake_cdtab_dma_addr,
+		ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS | ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED);
 	arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2_ste, 0);
+	/* Expect an additional sync to unset ignored bits: EATS and MEV */
 	arm_smmu_v3_test_ste_expect_hitless_transition(test, &s1_ste, &s2_ste,
 						       NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(3));
 }
@@ -605,10 +591,9 @@ arm_smmu_v3_write_ste_test_nested_s1bypass_to_s1dssbypass(struct kunit *test)
 	struct arm_smmu_ste s1_ste;
 	struct arm_smmu_ste s2_ste;
 
-	arm_smmu_test_make_nested_cdtable_ste(&s1_ste,
-					      STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS,
-					      fake_cdtab_dma_addr,
-					      ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS);
+	arm_smmu_test_make_cdtable_ste(
+		&s1_ste, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_BYPASS, fake_cdtab_dma_addr,
+		ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_ATS | ARM_SMMU_MASTER_TEST_NESTED);
 	arm_smmu_test_make_s2_ste(&s2_ste, 0);
 	arm_smmu_v3_test_ste_expect_hitless_transition(test, &s2_ste, &s1_ste,
 						       NUM_EXPECTED_SYNCS(2));


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-09 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-07 20:49 [PATCH rc v2 0/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix hitless STE update in nesting cases Nicolin Chen
2025-12-07 20:49 ` [PATCH rc v2 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add ignored bits to fix STE update sequence Nicolin Chen
2025-12-08  2:33   ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-07 20:49 ` [PATCH rc v2 2/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ignore STE MEV when computing the " Nicolin Chen
2025-12-08  2:33   ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-07 20:49 ` [PATCH rc v2 3/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ignore STE EATS " Nicolin Chen
2025-12-08  2:33   ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-07 20:49 ` [PATCH rc v2 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-test: Add nested s1bypass/s1dssbypass coverage Nicolin Chen
2025-12-08  3:43   ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-09 21:04     ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-12-10  1:53       ` Shuai Xue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aTiO69YZ9WA8dFe0@nvidia.com \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.