Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() semantics and implementation

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>]

On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 09:45:21PM -0500, Kurt Borja wrote:
> Implement iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() fully inline with the use of
> __iio_dev_mode_lock(), which takes care of sparse annotations.
> 
> To completely match iio_device_claim_direct() semantics, we need to
> also change iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() return semantics to usual
> true/false conditional lock semantics.

...

> -		if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
> +		if (!iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
>  			/*
>  			 * Replacing -EBUSY or other error code
>  			 * returned by iio_device_claim_buffer_mode()

In one of the previous files you removed a comment, and here it's still present.

...

> -		if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
> +		if (!iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
>  			/*
>  			 * This one is a *bit* hacky. If we cannot claim buffer
>  			 * mode, then try direct mode so that we make sure

Also check if this comment needs to be amended.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko