From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7A3F345CBF for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765808993; cv=none; b=t++xODVjEiUd4lUGBGltUtQnrDsu+tYvsJvfnkADcOInocTtoT5tcys+C0SVSY1oTZNp9S5FlNEOThj85VsiahlE5dHdi0ko7m1niSuB2byxCujmi8D7yy6ggCSA3M7wfEJRyT5u5eWMQlMF7t4HCwmU4co/3p4aEJHW18Sg8jw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765808993; c=relaxed/simple; bh=b7G/vWA3uaZblMeS6TDUkIwjMDCYyFObWisEy3vjINA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ULFf+ywmG+DgoqO1aAT4IzIzikdVOLROovCGfz5EltftrSrgS7504EWTNZQkIpK/NmhRJle4SPt/nTiCEoX9MLyFOCwpYN0m9/eP2hszPRlmiyeYN39RQUYMLQptJwQzhyYJxoQL4/bgWpnoqnj/gCv2aVjq6dshu1crrFrOKUY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=GaiIf6pY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="GaiIf6pY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=cCz879FCRdsNCiGbs8i4htwfMnPPM45h1G0s5DmTdNc=; b=GaiIf6pYxvKvHGqWPvcOjOmW9F GRHBvW182IcuocXEn3YZEe4Sev8JYQqSWU4i0f3mETdmKpquLE5SJZbaDRM0aC/hPj7YxFG32zFuP KS32e1p8vs812HCHkS17IT6T2eOdtQO4IXSOputXSz+vAqlmuXqqiYUTwmcjhnkQhKjEd8/7F6Pic Bjlu5/ROSSlRfvT0zdFPmHvouHilw3QajU3YMjw5pA5fGxAV4kVvySmYHWYSGpK4RDwl3EdO9JBLI 825SYvc8qabeCrD4j9k3xdrjBzfxTD1AXNamsVk6BsINzts+i+gcjH0imRvmg6ktnCl13kTAUEX3h 2s+IcPGw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vV9a8-00000003naO-3Q9x; Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:29:48 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 06:29:48 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: yebin Cc: Christoph Hellwig , djwong@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, chandan.babu@oracle.com, dchinner@redhat.com, yebin10@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix two issues about swapext Message-ID: References: <20251213035951.2237214-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com> <693FB68F.50400@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <693FB68F.50400@huaweicloud.com> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 03:19:43PM +0800, yebin wrote: > First, we encountered the issue described in > https://access.redhat.com/solutions/6095011 in our production That's behind a paywall unfortunately. > > Any chance you could add a reproducer to xfstests? > > > Yes, this issue is quite reproducible. It occurs inevitably when following > certain steps. This problem has existed for a long time. I think the reason > it's not easily detected is that the XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT IOCTL command is > generally used during defragmentation. Therefore, it is almost never > included in typical log replay scenarios. Can you send out an xfstests for this? Or at least a shell script fragment?