From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Almeida" <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 04/17] openrisc: Include <linux/cpumask.h> in smp.h
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 21:54:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUCDq_hDrQHjMAn5@antec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251215175806.102713-5-lyude@redhat.com>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 12:57:51PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> While OpenRISC currently doesn't fail to build upstream, it appears that
> include <asm/smp.h> in the right headers is enough to break that -
> primarily because OpenRISC's asm/smp.h header doesn't actually provide any
> definition for struct cpumask. Which means the only reason we aren't
> failing to build kernel is because we've been lucky enough that every spot
> including asm/smp.h already has definitions for struct cpumask pulled in.
>
> This became evident when trying to work on a patch series for adding
> ref-counted interrupt enable/disables to the kernel, where introducing a
> new interrupt_rc.h header suddenly introduced a build error on OpenRISC:
>
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt_rc.h:17,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:60,
> from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
> from include/linux/gfp.h:7,
> from include/linux/mm.h:7,
> from arch/openrisc/include/asm/pgalloc.h:20,
> from arch/openrisc/include/asm/io.h:18,
> from include/linux/io.h:12,
> from drivers/irqchip/irq-ompic.c:61:
> arch/openrisc/include/asm/smp.h:21:59: warning: 'struct cpumask'
> declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this
> definition or declaration
> 21 | extern void arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask);
> | ^~~~~~~
> arch/openrisc/include/asm/smp.h:23:54: warning: 'struct cpumask'
> declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this
> definition or declaration
> 23 | extern void set_smp_cross_call(void (*)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int));
> | ^~~~~~~
> drivers/irqchip/irq-ompic.c: In function 'ompic_of_init':
> >> drivers/irqchip/irq-ompic.c:191:28: error: passing argument 1 of
> 'set_smp_cross_call' from incompatible pointer type
> [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> 191 | set_smp_cross_call(ompic_raise_softirq);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | void (*)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int)
> arch/openrisc/include/asm/smp.h:23:32: note: expected 'void (*)(const
> struct cpumask *, unsigned int)' but argument is of type 'void
> (*)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int)'
> 23 | extern void set_smp_cross_call(void (*)(const struct cpumask *, unsigned int));
>
> To fix this, let's take an example from the smp.h headers of other
> architectures (x86, hexagon, arm64, probably more): just include
> linux/cpumask.h at the top.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/openrisc/include/asm/smp.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/smp.h
> index e21d2f12b5b67..0327d8cdae2d0 100644
> --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> #ifndef __ASM_OPENRISC_SMP_H
> #define __ASM_OPENRISC_SMP_H
>
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +
> #include <asm/spr.h>
> #include <asm/spr_defs.h>
This looks good to me.
Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-15 17:57 [PATCH v16 00/17] Refcounted interrupts, SpinLockIrq for rust Lyude Paul
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 01/17] preempt: Introduce HARDIRQ_DISABLE_BITS Lyude Paul
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 02/17] preempt: Track NMI nesting to separate per-CPU counter Lyude Paul
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 03/17] preempt: Introduce __preempt_count_{sub, add}_return() Lyude Paul
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 04/17] openrisc: Include <linux/cpumask.h> in smp.h Lyude Paul
2025-12-15 21:54 ` Stafford Horne [this message]
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 05/17] irq & spin_lock: Add counted interrupt disabling/enabling Lyude Paul
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 06/17] irq: Add KUnit test for refcounted interrupt enable/disable Lyude Paul
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 07/17] rust: Introduce interrupt module Lyude Paul
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 08/17] rust: helper: Add spin_{un,}lock_irq_{enable,disable}() helpers Lyude Paul
2025-12-16 12:15 ` Gary Guo
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 09/17] rust: sync: Add SpinLockIrq Lyude Paul
2025-12-16 12:20 ` Gary Guo
2025-12-22 5:50 ` Benno Lossin
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 10/17] rust: sync: Introduce lock::Backend::Context Lyude Paul
2025-12-22 6:10 ` Benno Lossin
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 11/17] rust: sync: lock: Add `Backend::BackendInContext` Lyude Paul
2025-12-22 6:19 ` Benno Lossin
2025-12-15 17:57 ` [PATCH v16 12/17] rust: sync: lock/global: Rename B to G in trait bounds Lyude Paul
2025-12-16 16:15 ` Dirk Behme
2025-12-17 20:33 ` Boqun Feng
2025-12-22 6:23 ` Benno Lossin
2025-12-15 17:58 ` [PATCH v16 13/17] rust: sync: Add a lifetime parameter to lock::global::GlobalGuard Lyude Paul
2025-12-22 6:28 ` Benno Lossin
2025-12-15 17:58 ` [PATCH v16 14/17] rust: sync: Expose lock::Backend Lyude Paul
2025-12-22 6:27 ` Benno Lossin
2025-12-15 17:58 ` [PATCH v16 15/17] rust: sync: lock/global: Add Backend parameter to GlobalGuard Lyude Paul
2025-12-22 6:27 ` Benno Lossin
2025-12-15 17:58 ` [PATCH v16 16/17] rust: sync: lock/global: Add BackendInContext support to GlobalLock Lyude Paul
2025-12-22 6:25 ` Benno Lossin
2025-12-15 17:58 ` [PATCH v16 17/17] locking: Switch to _irq_{disable,enable}() variants in cleanup guards Lyude Paul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aUCDq_hDrQHjMAn5@antec \
--to=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.