From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from complex.crustytoothpaste.net (complex.crustytoothpaste.net [172.105.7.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA5221C17D for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2025 22:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765837780; cv=none; b=jijDnav3Mn+nOGg9wG1alTb7YXktp+KdCH2aw/jRt3AUyjW94JnHpNddG8Dhj+AqSag2jWvzLtq7GSqeKEvRGLhes9XKon1YtjOadqDEUo4hVjt4WVKi9zcDheM8kmdJ12W8rP/DnYFvBWxh3RdLnRWLW60PEKqUpxy3LMKwb+s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765837780; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Jgqie/ZVNriaJIw4A/qqp6h6AjSQMkmEhqFo/t2KGX4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bBR+SzbvsWr8Fxfj4HiTyWQ3zN6fLtm6JLnmmDV+oOVZfEsD7yzOQsHhgtSlJcJKJNfUPBs85//2scbKTnH1fnIbrDRJJFDQjX3Q0Op4phekDAoOeAEX3bxS7m0zq/ITQyJfk4P+8/890qmlyZyUi0ia3+pkm7Zl7R7M1sm0Y8U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b=zc7l6M8x; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b="zc7l6M8x" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1765837777; bh=Jgqie/ZVNriaJIw4A/qqp6h6AjSQMkmEhqFo/t2KGX4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=zc7l6M8xgOWzfQIykjUvFlUGvDw1NwlNDdcM0vQoldzBQi7Lzg9fivJmXkiWS8Zy0 8obfInzE44cH872yw+L6UHW1p1uNZgsta4BKcoW7hXrC/PrCfowugqx8sbCLt1Aa8b ix6D6Agw1IO3vsbS1NDn7UpdvNyJznFFMA19yTUKWXnL1SGNakuxDuzFluUXCKZ86u Q9YCelJ6wWVlvWF69K8hSTcyzAYUomTOEsdQrq847itIt0GoZ5/2Yaxzc2NwHfh69t iqJi9UZ73vaZBwWbW0DP+a8zP47zVkdBCoPe/O215ax1rCuTuQfM0g8etEu2M2qpWE y0qQjcFO6G7aE010FnSmd8hqxw1PohWTCTXr+w7OdpFbD/ofeqqqpaeMZDMP+sg1RJ 54ZK4Tf3z9XwxsijAkw2+Mu2CU8FACIw70ukoQvSdcEPBQjcoCUe0NeXyowo08dNvq wmJyEc3aoUFtwHffIg0+UN+AxqFjHdvnma6ZKkyxyXXDLcq0iKc Received: from fruit.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:f2c0:f00f:f901:4cd1:4dc0:5be:c1c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by complex.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 194EF2008B; Mon, 15 Dec 2025 22:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 22:29:35 +0000 From: "brian m. carlson" To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Carlo Marcelo Arenas =?utf-8?B?QmVsw7Nu?= , Stefan Haller , Git Subject: Re: Would it make sense to add a commit.signOff config? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: "brian m. carlson" , Junio C Hamano , Carlo Marcelo Arenas =?utf-8?B?QmVsw7Nu?= , Stefan Haller , Git References: <86c5d40d-5a06-4a69-90d8-a737685b0536@haller-berlin.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T7EDo1a7NYqyA/9L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.13 (2024-03-09) --T7EDo1a7NYqyA/9L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2025-12-15 at 01:59:46, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "brian m. carlson" writes: >=20 > > I think this would be a fine approach or we could add an entry in the > > Git FAQ (or both). I agree that this is something that comes up > > frequently and writing it down in a more visible way would be kinder to > > users and mailing list participants. >=20 > Something like this, then? Yup, that looks good to me. --=20 brian m. carlson (they/them) Toronto, Ontario, CA --T7EDo1a7NYqyA/9L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.4.8 (GNU/Linux) iHUEABYKAB0WIQQILOaKnbxl+4PRw5F8DEliiIeigQUCaUCLzwAKCRB8DEliiIei geL3AQDX/GhZFUnOQdPv4vjpq8WEn+nTV/t3JgFGlciKAwFzAwD9F02r/RHknsjs X+9H2Txan4JbKC5AS7ZWegMeTL2Q2wo= =CRe4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T7EDo1a7NYqyA/9L--