All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, martin.petersen@oracle.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+660d079d90f8a1baf54d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: add allocation size check in blkdev_pr_read_keys()
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 23:46:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUEOWFY3d3vsA1EI@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251216051147.12818-1-kartikey406@gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:41:47AM +0530, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> blkdev_pr_read_keys() takes num_keys from userspace and uses it to
> calculate the allocation size for keys_info via struct_size(). While
> there is a check for SIZE_MAX (integer overflow), there is no upper
> bound validation on the allocation size itself.
> 
> A malicious or buggy userspace can pass a large num_keys value that
> doesn't trigger overflow but still results in an excessive allocation
> attempt, causing a warning in the page allocator when the order exceeds
> MAX_PAGE_ORDER.
> 
> Fix this by introducing PR_KEYS_MAX_NUM to limit the number of keys to
> a sane value. This makes the SIZE_MAX check redundant, so remove it.
> Also switch to kvzalloc/kvfree to handle larger allocations gracefully.
> 
> Fixes: 22a1ffea5f80 ("block: add IOC_PR_READ_KEYS ioctl")
> Tested-by: syzbot+660d079d90f8a1baf54d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Reported-by: syzbot+660d079d90f8a1baf54d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=660d079d90f8a1baf54d
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251212013510.3576091-1-kartikey406@gmail.com/T/ [v1]
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
>   - Added PR_KEYS_MAX_NUM (64K) limit instead of checking KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE
>   - Removed redundant SIZE_MAX check
>   - Switched to kvzalloc/kvfree
> ---
>  block/ioctl.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c
> index 61feed686418..98c4c7b9e7fe 100644
> --- a/block/ioctl.c
> +++ b/block/ioctl.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>  #include "blk.h"
>  #include "blk-crypto-internal.h"
>  
> +#define PR_KEYS_MAX_NUM		(1u << 16)

I think _NUM is redundant here.  Also this should probably go into
the uapi header.


      reply	other threads:[~2025-12-16  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-16  5:11 [PATCH v2] block: add allocation size check in blkdev_pr_read_keys() Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-12-16  7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aUEOWFY3d3vsA1EI@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kartikey406@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzbot+660d079d90f8a1baf54d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.