From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B4AF274670; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766142625; cv=none; b=pWKzuciHfkZueT4uSkz32vdCq6SuQwLoJsGdHFegs7TS8oQIq/JPSOgnaJg6uvq3yw8Ur5v26i85oJ0+Dm8ZgV6LE4HTgRkowUcN5d+ytPaH42yY2JOhRtnoGH3TrCX8AO9N3UJTnK1STsgUEmlmVq7BIjVTqpbU0BGEtONQxgI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766142625; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ymHDycBiD3cdlOsRLJpMzh+CAe7R8FTNqUi6noJRgc8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KaBPMQvQigmB/JBroCKCu4mGLTCFZBsC4fWN4aROP6M+J92vlMGEW/BBaZz28GAm04zsIJrvPOiBZCr+dHwkujFmb0UcxTcSffQaQFbdOPxJOE/0TBouZmz5SBnYU4xbXko/td6o0o6lyQ2HKyJFLpJMbMiQRavfLjfE2Zt4jAc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=QUu/BlPP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="QUu/BlPP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=77glmLHUn38+bjFwaQX0aUFqGU278qbMfSMlpnIXh9Q=; b=QUu/BlPPopOOjJPBENVYe9e2zd Rwwa1KOm6AX0D8t7dMX8AgblxZ+f/bvv0wzvCBIJbzxaVu4RVeBTNwolVuNdS0PbtI5u3PuDHZYwv PUbmh8AWksaiStR/VhSELAEcYgwsr7cEYvP2RQTJ81H99ZXltiGAw8A3W3wM1ueDVIO8VuxnH6MgH dPbDdiCB1q3UmHcWvTu6LAaFOLwhbiRkY1jQF7G9zzNeb4m6wNYTYByMRqlLlGFK1ccWeD8dRSIp1 GtXK46QkPVV5s6Bb4xEiJ43xjdwmR0eh5u6pi4ccIhHQY/sCMtnuCcZGC2VYt6TPnwZqhTRqKeTFj JXm29eVg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vWYNG-0000000AAoe-3YGk; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:10:18 +0000 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 03:10:18 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Joanne Chang Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Zorro Lang , fstests@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Chao Yu , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] generic/735: disable for f2fs Message-ID: References: <20251218071717.2573035-1-joannechien@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: fstests@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 04:53:04PM +0800, Joanne Chang wrote: > Thanks for the reply. To clarify, I meant testing the architectural > limit of blocks per file, not the current free blocks. Sorry for any > confusion in my previous reply. > > The limit is indeed the maximum file size. However, since both the F2FS > file size limit and the test's requirements are calculated as > (block_number * block_size), I believe it is simpler to just test the > block number. Well, for the file size you can test by doing a truncate to the expected size and _notrun if not supported. I can't really think of a way that easy to directly check for the number of supported blocks. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4250DD767D4 for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:10:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: Subject:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:To:From:Date:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=2eXUJc7wRaC00pP2gsP8hPEZDmZebCVJy5Mx6FS0ZXc=; b=UsPEbi6p4hWs/Ql/63RLTffzQO NhgCVEytqfMFxKs85zHhXbPe7LmXr5KF6i+aZm/+2BRkeDezsKOMxMYgn7emT0ajAZs0DZA3JL6io kPUiXHvExyY6+qOWnmbefPLf49/BxemtDm9G0zpefEF+ISWDkbtSOSoc7lUKtjg5OV4I=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1vWYNN-0008Dn-Us; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:10:26 +0000 Received: from [172.30.29.66] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1vWYNL-0008DW-Ua for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:10:24 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=77glmLHUn38+bjFwaQX0aUFqGU278qbMfSMlpnIXh9Q=; b=Xwf13x92GQwSJm43QsZ3OUGe9Q kgHZjOfF9K2NqHZFfiq1ohpIY7Lz432h0sgw/Z8/jiRCfmFV8N+QOj585cr6IasgWiPBQG2qQcqDE G6/5NxCF/gxMq2wATsf8tr7Mj3vm9D+vqbJulTa5rlSsqJDGf6hX5ZaUKbkrQL0t5TDM=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=77glmLHUn38+bjFwaQX0aUFqGU278qbMfSMlpnIXh9Q=; b=Asp4QEhCiojvGg6TR/AV3QGZFh JXB6kjr4PdwVlW+EM0uWLVC7cMpG72Ffr48RRmYfixIG+oyLwMCDbNI0LMGA2ENTKh0HsCelLbfjm pHxEEz/NqaHWrP80W9WUYS+ea38f4TegKwYOysZtUwIW07MEdFumaL7rUMCqjmwPRE0M=; Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.95) id 1vWYNM-0004gv-5t for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:10:24 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=77glmLHUn38+bjFwaQX0aUFqGU278qbMfSMlpnIXh9Q=; b=QUu/BlPPopOOjJPBENVYe9e2zd Rwwa1KOm6AX0D8t7dMX8AgblxZ+f/bvv0wzvCBIJbzxaVu4RVeBTNwolVuNdS0PbtI5u3PuDHZYwv PUbmh8AWksaiStR/VhSELAEcYgwsr7cEYvP2RQTJ81H99ZXltiGAw8A3W3wM1ueDVIO8VuxnH6MgH dPbDdiCB1q3UmHcWvTu6LAaFOLwhbiRkY1jQF7G9zzNeb4m6wNYTYByMRqlLlGFK1ccWeD8dRSIp1 GtXK46QkPVV5s6Bb4xEiJ43xjdwmR0eh5u6pi4ccIhHQY/sCMtnuCcZGC2VYt6TPnwZqhTRqKeTFj JXm29eVg==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vWYNG-0000000AAoe-3YGk; Fri, 19 Dec 2025 11:10:18 +0000 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 03:10:18 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Joanne Chang Message-ID: References: <20251218071717.2573035-1-joannechien@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Headers-End: 1vWYNM-0004gv-5t Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v1] generic/735: disable for f2fs X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Zorro Lang , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 04:53:04PM +0800, Joanne Chang wrote: > Thanks for the reply. To clarify, I meant testing the architectural > limit of blocks per file, not the current free blocks. Sorry for any > confusion in my previous reply. > > The limit is indeed the maximum file size. However, since both the F2FS > file size limit and the test's requirements are calculated as > (block_number * block_size), I believe it is simpler to just test the > block number. Well, for the file size you can test by doing a truncate to the expected size and _notrun if not supported. I can't really think of a way that easy to directly check for the number of supported blocks. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel