From: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@google.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
gourry@gourry.net, longman@redhat.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mhocko@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev, tj@kernel.org,
mkoutny@suse.com, david@kernel.org, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, axelrasmussen@google.com,
chenridong@huaweicloud.com, yuanchu@google.com,
weixugc@google.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/vmscan: fix demotion targets checks in reclaim/demotion
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 21:38:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aUsLv7LAgqGlhTjW@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251223212032.665731-1-bingjiao@google.com>
On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 09:19:59PM +0000, Bing Jiao wrote:
> Fix two bugs in demote_folio_list() and can_demote() due to incorrect
> demotion target checks in reclaim/demotion.
>
Considering these bugs are introduced from one commit, I think
it is better to fix it in one patch rather than split it.
v3: Rename cpuset_node_allowed() as cpuset_node_get_allowed() to
return effective_mems directly, providing better versatility
(thanks Ridong for the suggestion).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-23 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-20 6:10 [PATCH] mm/vmscan: respect mems_effective in demote_folio_list() Bing Jiao
2025-12-20 19:20 ` Andrew Morton
2025-12-22 6:16 ` Bing Jiao
2025-12-21 12:07 ` Gregory Price
2025-12-22 6:28 ` Bing Jiao
2025-12-21 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fix demotion targets checks in reclaim/demotion Bing Jiao
2025-12-21 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/vmscan: respect mems_effective in demote_folio_list() Bing Jiao
2025-12-21 23:41 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-22 2:38 ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-22 21:56 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-22 22:18 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-21 23:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/vmscan: check all allowed targets in can_demote() Bing Jiao
2025-12-22 2:51 ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-22 6:09 ` Bing Jiao
2025-12-22 8:28 ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-23 21:19 ` [PATCH v3] mm/vmscan: fix demotion targets checks in reclaim/demotion Bing Jiao
2025-12-23 21:38 ` Bing Jiao [this message]
2025-12-24 1:19 ` Gregory Price
2025-12-26 18:48 ` Bing Jiao
2026-01-05 21:57 ` Bing Jiao
2025-12-24 1:49 ` Chen Ridong
2025-12-26 18:58 ` Bing Jiao
2025-12-26 19:32 ` Waiman Long
2025-12-26 20:24 ` Waiman Long
2026-01-04 9:04 ` Bing Jiao
2026-01-04 8:54 ` [PATCH v4] " Bing Jiao
2026-01-04 18:27 ` Andrew Morton
2026-01-05 5:08 ` Bing Jiao
2026-01-05 2:48 ` Chen Ridong
2026-01-05 5:10 ` Bing Jiao
2026-01-05 5:01 ` [PATCH v5] " Bing Jiao
2026-01-05 15:54 ` Gregory Price
2026-01-05 21:34 ` Bing Jiao
2026-01-06 7:56 ` [PATCH v6] " Bing Jiao
2026-01-06 14:23 ` Gregory Price
2026-01-06 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2026-01-07 1:27 ` Chen Ridong
2026-01-08 3:32 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] " Bing Jiao
2026-01-08 3:32 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] " Bing Jiao
2026-01-08 3:32 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] mm/vmscan: select the closest preferred node in demote_folio_list() Bing Jiao
2026-01-10 3:00 ` [PATCH] mm/vmscan: fix uninitialized variable " Bing Jiao
2026-01-10 3:38 ` Bing Jiao
2026-01-14 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 0/2] mm/vmscan: select the closest preferred node " Bing Jiao
2026-01-14 6:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] " Bing Jiao
2026-01-14 20:53 ` [PATCH v9 0/2] mm/vmscan: fix demotion targets checks in reclaim/demotion Bing Jiao
2026-01-14 20:53 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] " Bing Jiao
2026-02-02 4:15 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-01-14 20:53 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] mm/vmscan: select the closest perferred node in demote_folio_list() Bing Jiao
2026-02-06 18:52 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-01-16 0:00 ` [PATCH v9 0/2] mm/vmscan: fix demotion targets checks in reclaim/demotion Andrew Morton
2026-01-16 7:00 ` Bing Jiao
2026-01-30 23:35 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-01-31 23:58 ` Bing Jiao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-12-27 19:22 [PATCH v3] " kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aUsLv7LAgqGlhTjW@google.com \
--to=bingjiao@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.