Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] doc: Document process_state

[Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>]

Hi!
> > > - * R - process is running
> > > - * S - process is sleeping
> > > - * D - process sleeping uninterruptibly
> > > - * Z - zombie process
> > > - * T - process is traced
> > > + * Possible process states:
> > Maybe: use link to https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/ps.1.html ?
> > 
> > -* Possible process states:
> > +* Possible process states (see :man1:`ps`):
> 
> 1. We do not have man1 defined in exlinks in conf.py
> 
> 2. Even if added there exlinks does not seem work from documentation
>    generated from headers

This actually works, once I fixed typo in the conf.py change.

> > > + * - **R** Process is running.
> > > + * - **S** Process is sleeping.
> > > + * - **D** Process sleeping uninterruptibly.
> > > + * - **Z** Zombie process.
> > > + * - **T** Process is traced.
> > > + * - **t** Tracing stopped.
> > > + * - **X** Process id dead.
> > 
> > Process state is outdated, man ps(1) lists:
> > 
> >                D    uninterruptible sleep (usually I/O)
> >                I    idle kernel thread
> >                R    running or runnable (on run queue)
> >                S    interruptible sleep (waiting for an
> >                     event to complete)
> >                T    stopped by job control signal
> >                t    stopped by debugger during the tracing
> >                W    paging (not valid since Linux 2.6)
> >                X    dead (should never be seen)
> >                Z    defunct (“zombie”) process, terminated
> >                     but not reaped by its parent
> > 
> > We miss:
> > * I (from kernel 4.2, maybe not relevant when we use it for a child which
> > is userspace)
> > * W (irrelevant as it is not valid)
> 
> Indeed these are not relevent for us.
> 
> > * Z
> 
> Zombie process is described in the list.
> 
> > Also, do we want specify the process states in both TST_PROCESS_STATE_WAIT() and
> > TST_THREAD_STATE_WAIT(), or just specify it in one and mention in the other that
> > they specify it? (via :ref: or c:func:).
> 
> Again, none of the :ref: or c:func: is working in docs generate from
> headers.

And this one needs to be just TST_PROCESS_STATE_WAIT() to be processed
as a link in headers.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp