Re: [RFC 01/10] qom: Rename ObjectPropertyFlags to ObjectPropertyAccessorFlags

[Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>]

> > I'm not sure about this. Currently, these read/write flags are actually
> > specific to pointer properties (as showed by the changes in this patch,
> > which all involve object_property_add_*_ptr() / object_class_property_add_*_ptr()).
> > 
> > Other property types doesn't yet support flag parameters, so additional
> > interface modifications are still needed.
> > 
> > And for now other property types either need to explicitly specify get/set
> > accessors (e.g., object_property_add_bool()) or directly use the default
> > get/set methods (e.g., object_property_add_link()).
> > 
> > If we extend read/write flags to other property types, such as adding
> > "flags" argument to object_property_add_bool(), we must ensure the
> > OBJ_PROP_FLAG_READ flag align with "get" argument and OBJ_PROP_FLAG_WRITE
> > flag align with "set" parameters.
> 
> Ain't thouse accessors callbacks?
> /I mean to you still can check flags inside of generic object property code
> without touching setter/getter./

Ah, I see, the default flags is OBJ_PROP_FLAG_READWRITE and I can check
them before calling setter/getter.

> >This would introduces additional complexity.
> 
> it still might be woth considering to compare this series with alternative approach.

Yes, will try to reuse current ObjectPropertyFlags.

Thanks,
Zhao