All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>,
	arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Document arm,poll-transport property
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 16:02:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWUbFb0q2-XuAySm@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260102-masked-spirited-labrador-33eae0@quoll>

On Fri, Jan 02, 2026 at 12:39:12PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 10:29:18PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Document new property arm,poll-transport, which sets all SCMI operation into
> 
> Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
> process (neither too early nor over the limit):
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L597
> 
> > poll mode. This is meant to work around uncooperative SCP implementations,
> > which do not generate completion interrupts. This applies primarily on mbox
> > shmem based implementations.
> > 
> > With this property set, such implementations which do not generate interrupts
> > can be interacted with, until they are fixed to generate interrupts properly.
> > 
> > Note that, because the original base protocol exchange also requires some
> > sort of completion mechanism, it is not possible to query SCMI itself for
> > this property and it must be described in DT. While this does look a bit
> > like policy, the SCMI provider is part of the hardware, hence DT.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
> > ---
> > Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> > Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > Cc: arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > V2: s@mean@&t and limit poll transport to mailbox/shmem only
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml         | 10 ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > index be817fd9cc34b..f4bf4173c5c7e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/arm,scmi.yaml
> > @@ -146,6 +146,13 @@ properties:
> >        this platform. If set, the value should be non-zero.
> >      minimum: 1
> >  
> > +  arm,poll-transport:
> > +    type: boolean
> > +    description:
> > +      An optional property which unconditionally forces polling in all transports.
> > +      This is mainly meant to work around uncooperative SCP, which does not generate
> 
> Also not wrapped.
> 
> Anyway, you described the desired Linux feature or behavior, not the
> actual hardware. The bindings are about the latter, so instead you need
> to rephrase the property and its description to match actual hardware
> capabilities/features/configuration etc.
> 

I agree with this assessment. Rephrasing the property to reflect the actual
hardware/firmware characteristics makes more sense. Something along the lines
of `arm,no-completion-interrupt`, or a similar name, would better capture the
underlying reality, namely that the platform or firmware does not generate a
completion interrupt without encoding OS-specific policy or behavior.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

      reply	other threads:[~2026-01-12 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-31 21:29 [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Document arm,poll-transport property Marek Vasut
2025-12-31 21:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Implement " Marek Vasut
2026-01-12 12:06   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-01-12 12:53     ` Cristian Marussi
2026-01-12 15:58       ` Sudeep Holla
2026-01-02 11:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Document " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-01-12 16:02   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aWUbFb0q2-XuAySm@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.