From: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com>
To: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] bpf: Fix an off-by-one error in check_indirect_jump
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:29:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWdwGKLsL7G7IQ3z@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260114093914.2403982-2-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>
On 26/01/14 05:39PM, Xu Kuohai wrote:
> From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
>
> Fix an off-by-one error in check_indirect_jump() that skips the last
> element returned by copy_insn_array_uniq().
>
> Fixes: 493d9e0d6083 ("bpf, x86: add support for indirect jumps")
> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index faa1ecc1fe9d..22605d9e0ffa 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -20336,7 +20336,7 @@ static int check_indirect_jump(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *in
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < n - 1; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> other_branch = push_stack(env, env->gotox_tmp_buf->items[i],
> env->insn_idx, env->cur_state->speculative);
> if (IS_ERR(other_branch))
> --
> 2.47.3
Nack, the last state doesn't require a push_stack() call, it is
verified directly under this loop. Instead of this patch, just
add another call to mark_indirect_target().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-14 9:39 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/4] emit ENDBR/BTI instructions for indirect jump targets Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 9:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/4] bpf: Fix an off-by-one error in check_indirect_jump Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 10:29 ` Anton Protopopov [this message]
2026-01-15 7:31 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 9:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/4] bpf: Add helper to detect indirect jump targets Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 11:00 ` Anton Protopopov
2026-01-15 7:37 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 20:46 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-01-15 7:47 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-01-18 17:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-18 23:22 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-01-19 2:35 ` Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 9:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/4] bpf, x86: Emit ENDBR for " Xu Kuohai
2026-01-14 16:46 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-14 9:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/4] bpf, arm64: Emit BTI for indirect jump target Xu Kuohai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aWdwGKLsL7G7IQ3z@mail.gmail.com \
--to=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.