From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC76DD41143 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1204361.1519049 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1vgJEv-0000Yk-Fo; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:02:01 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1204361.1519049; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:02:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1vgJEv-0000Yd-Cq; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:02:01 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1204361; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:02:00 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1vgJEu-0000YX-8Q for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:02:00 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vgJEm-004jDg-0a; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:01:51 +0000 Received: from [19.12.91.86] (helo=localhost) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vgJEl-004KR1-1L; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 09:01:51 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID :Subject:Cc:To:Date:From; bh=GGMrPRFB+xHLzHgb8fqcJuD0KTFzCPZv4Y+fcJ5KC+A=; b= GlkDmHWZ7m+QsQbWjbF7AUUXt0YYgSGtJVpQd4l4MOw+1vy+h1WJmmKLpA0l/AZXa3E9jtxwWPoQ9 rbPsK4mmfgiDRZrLw4tBHDVQRJScY3Q0H8K7f02nz9ENeWbEON4P3zpEshOLgudSTsquZSU+sK/eP q1cICu1dHGzaf+WK8=; From: dmukhin@xen.org Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 01:01:50 -0800 To: Jan Beulich Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, anthony.perard@vates.tech, julien@xen.org, michal.orzel@amd.com, roger.pau@citrix.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, dmukhin@ford.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] tests: fixup domid make fragment Message-ID: References: <20260111041145.553673-1-dmukhin@ford.com> <20260111041145.553673-2-dmukhin@ford.com> <2badbc33-f78c-47d9-acef-9383a5aa3387@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2badbc33-f78c-47d9-acef-9383a5aa3387@suse.com> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 12:16:46PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 11.01.2026 05:11, dmukhin@xen.org wrote: > > From: Denis Mukhin > > > > There can be multiple test harnesses per one test target (e.g. harness.h > > and harness2.h). Account for that by further parametrizing existing > > emit-harness-nested-rule(). > > Multiple harnesses within a single dir imo likely would share headers, but > use different .c files. Also, why would dependencies on headers need > recording at all? The Makefile includes $(DEPS_INCLUDE), so all dependency > concerns should be covered (or else the generic machinery would need > fixing). Imo all of this wants simplifying (dropping?) rather than further > complicating. Whoops, I forgot to drop that multi-harness stuff. Thanks! > > Jan