From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Aksh Garg <a-garg7@ti.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, mani@kernel.org,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
s-vadapalli@ti.com, danishanwar@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: dwc: ep: Fix resizable BAR support for multi-PF configurations
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 10:58:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXCjP8KZw1ig8i-W@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260121054214.274429-2-a-garg7@ti.com>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 11:12:13AM +0530, Aksh Garg wrote:
> The resizable BAR support added by the commit 3a3d4cabe681
> ("PCI: dwc: ep: Allow EPF drivers to configure the size of Resizable
> BARs") incorrectly configures the resizable BARs only for the first
> Physical Function (PF0) in EP mode.
>
> The resizable BAR configuration functions use generic dw_pcie_*_dbi
> operations instead of physical function specific dw_pcie_ep_*_dbi
> operations. This causes resizable BAR configuration to always target
> PF0 regardless of the requested function number.
>
> Additionally, dw_pcie_ep_init_non_sticky_registers() only initializes
> resizable BAR registers for PF0, leaving other PFs unconfigured during
> the execution of this function.
>
> Fix this by using physical function specific configuration space access
> operations throughout the resizable BAR code path and initializing
> registers for all the physical functions that support resizable BARs.
>
> Fixes: 3a3d4cabe681 ("PCI: dwc: ep: Allow EPF drivers to configure the size of Resizable BARs")
> Signed-off-by: Aksh Garg <a-garg7@ti.com>
> ---
> .../pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 49 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index 19571ac2b961..f222677a7a87 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,13 @@ static u8 dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, u8 cap)
> cap, ep, func_no);
> }
>
> +static u16 dw_pcie_ep_find_ext_capability(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep,
> + u8 func_no, u8 cap)
> +{
> + return PCI_FIND_NEXT_EXT_CAP(dw_pcie_ep_read_cfg, 0,
> + cap, ep, func_no);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * dw_pcie_ep_hide_ext_capability - Hide a capability from the linked list
> * @pci: DWC PCI device
> @@ -217,22 +224,22 @@ static void dw_pcie_ep_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 func_no, u8 vfunc_no,
> ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = 0;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int dw_pcie_ep_get_rebar_offset(struct dw_pcie *pci,
> +static unsigned int dw_pcie_ep_get_rebar_offset(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> enum pci_barno bar)
> {
> u32 reg, bar_index;
> unsigned int offset, nbars;
> int i;
>
> - offset = dw_pcie_find_ext_capability(pci, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_REBAR);
> + offset = dw_pcie_ep_find_ext_capability(ep, func_no, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_REBAR);
> if (!offset)
> return offset;
>
> - reg = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL);
> + reg = dw_pcie_ep_readl_dbi(ep, func_no, offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL);
> nbars = FIELD_GET(PCI_REBAR_CTRL_NBAR_MASK, reg);
>
> for (i = 0; i < nbars; i++, offset += PCI_REBAR_CTRL) {
> - reg = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL);
> + reg = dw_pcie_ep_readl_dbi(ep, func_no, offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL);
> bar_index = FIELD_GET(PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_IDX, reg);
> if (bar_index == bar)
> return offset;
> @@ -253,7 +260,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_bar_resizable(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> u32 rebar_cap, rebar_ctrl;
> int ret;
>
> - rebar_offset = dw_pcie_ep_get_rebar_offset(pci, bar);
> + rebar_offset = dw_pcie_ep_get_rebar_offset(ep, func_no, bar);
> if (!rebar_offset)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -283,16 +290,16 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_set_bar_resizable(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> * 1 MB to 128 TB. Bits 31:16 in PCI_REBAR_CTRL define "supported sizes"
> * bits for sizes 256 TB to 8 EB. Disallow sizes 256 TB to 8 EB.
> */
> - rebar_ctrl = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, rebar_offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL);
> + rebar_ctrl = dw_pcie_ep_readl_dbi(ep, func_no, rebar_offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL);
> rebar_ctrl &= ~GENMASK(31, 16);
> - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, rebar_offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL, rebar_ctrl);
> + dw_pcie_ep_writel_dbi(ep, func_no, rebar_offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL, rebar_ctrl);
>
> /*
> * The "selected size" (bits 13:8) in PCI_REBAR_CTRL are automatically
> * updated when writing PCI_REBAR_CAP, see "Figure 3-26 Resizable BAR
> * Example for 32-bit Memory BAR0" in DWC EP databook 5.96a.
> */
> - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, rebar_offset + PCI_REBAR_CAP, rebar_cap);
> + dw_pcie_ep_writel_dbi(ep, func_no, rebar_offset + PCI_REBAR_CAP, rebar_cap);
>
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
>
> @@ -836,20 +843,17 @@ void dw_pcie_ep_deinit(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_pcie_ep_deinit);
>
> -static void dw_pcie_ep_init_non_sticky_registers(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +static void __dw_pcie_ep_init_non_sticky_registers(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no)
> {
> - struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = &pci->ep;
> unsigned int offset;
> unsigned int nbars;
> enum pci_barno bar;
> u32 reg, i, val;
>
> - offset = dw_pcie_find_ext_capability(pci, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_REBAR);
> -
> - dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> + offset = dw_pcie_ep_find_ext_capability(ep, func_no, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_REBAR);
>
> if (offset) {
> - reg = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL);
> + reg = dw_pcie_ep_readl_dbi(ep, func_no, offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL);
> nbars = FIELD_GET(PCI_REBAR_CTRL_NBAR_MASK, reg);
>
> /*
> @@ -870,16 +874,29 @@ static void dw_pcie_ep_init_non_sticky_registers(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> * the controller when RESBAR_CAP_REG is written, which
> * is why RESBAR_CAP_REG is written here.
> */
> - val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL);
> + val = dw_pcie_ep_readl_dbi(ep, func_no, offset + PCI_REBAR_CTRL);
> bar = FIELD_GET(PCI_REBAR_CTRL_BAR_IDX, val);
> if (ep->epf_bar[bar])
> pci_epc_bar_size_to_rebar_cap(ep->epf_bar[bar]->size, &val);
> else
> val = BIT(4);
>
> - dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_REBAR_CAP, val);
> + dw_pcie_ep_writel_dbi(ep, func_no, offset + PCI_REBAR_CAP, val);
> }
> }
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_pcie_ep_init_non_sticky_registers(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +{
> + struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = &pci->ep;
> + u8 func_no, funcs;
> +
> + funcs = ep->epc->max_functions;
Initialize this on the same line as the variable is declared.
u8 func_no; will be on a separate line.
> +
> + dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
> +
> + for (func_no = 0; func_no < funcs; func_no++)
> + __dw_pcie_ep_init_non_sticky_registers(ep, func_no);
>
> dw_pcie_setup(pci);
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Thank you for fixing this!
Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
You do need another patch in this series though, that fixes:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.19-rc6/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c#L972-L986
As currently, ptm_cap_base is fetched using dw_pcie_find_ext_capability()
instead of your new dw_pcie_ep_find_ext_capability() which takes a func_no.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-21 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-21 5:42 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: dwc: ep: Enhance multi-function endpoint support Aksh Garg
2026-01-21 5:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: dwc: ep: Fix resizable BAR support for multi-PF configurations Aksh Garg
2026-01-21 9:58 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-01-21 11:40 ` Aksh Garg
2026-01-22 5:05 ` Aksh Garg
2026-01-22 5:56 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-22 6:20 ` Aksh Garg
2026-01-21 5:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: dwc: ep: Add per-PF BAR and iATU mapping support Aksh Garg
2026-01-21 9:20 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-21 11:35 ` [EXTERNAL] " Aksh Garg
2026-01-21 12:56 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-21 8:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] PCI: dwc: ep: Enhance multi-function endpoint support Niklas Cassel
2026-01-21 9:27 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-01-21 11:04 ` [EXTERNAL] " Aksh Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXCjP8KZw1ig8i-W@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=a-garg7@ti.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=danishanwar@ti.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.