From: Minu Jin <s9430939@naver.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com,
zxcv2569763104@gmail.com, milospuric856@gmail.com,
karanja99erick@gmail.com, weibu@redadmin.org,
dan.carpenter@linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read()
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 16:26:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXMiwivUd_j79kZS@JMW-Ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026012336-filter-starlight-0fb3@gregkh>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 07:25:07AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 02:41:23AM +0900, Minu Jin wrote:
> > This series improves error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() and cleans up
> > the code style to comply with kernel standards.
> >
> > In v6, I have reorganized the patches into a series of two to satisfy
> > both Greg and Dan's feedback:
> >
> > 1. The first patch combines the logic change and caller updates.
> > The function change and the caller updates must be in the same
> > patch. If they are separated, the code will not work correctly
> > or will cause errors at that specific point in the history.
> >
> > 2. The second patch focuses purely on code style cleanup (changing uint
> > to unsigned int) as requested by Andy Shevchenko.
> >
> > Regarding the logic change in _rtw_pktfile_read():
> >
> > The original code used a ternary operator to read whatever data was
> > available, even if it was less than requested. This could lead to
> > callers processing incomplete data without knowing it.
> >
> > I have changed this to return -EINVAL when the remaining data is insufficient.
> > This is safer because most callers expect the exact amount of data and
> > should not proceed with a partial read.
> >
> > Changes in v6:
> > - Reorganized into a 2-patch series to maintain git bisect safety.
> > - Combined function logic changes with caller updates into Patch 1.
> > - Separated style cleanup (uint -> unsigned int) into Patch 2.
>
> Where is the list of changes for previous versions?
>
> Also, was this tested on real hardware for this device? As you are
> changing the main data path, that should be required here.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Regarding hardware testing:
I don't have access to hardware with this chipset. However,
I have
- Reviewed all call sites carefully
- Verified the code compiles without warnings
- Ran smatch static analysis with no issues found
If anyone has the hardware and could test this series, I would
appreciate it.
Regarding the change log history:
Changes in v6:
- Reorganized into a 2-patch series to maintain git bisect safety
(addressed Dan Carpenter's feedback).
- Combined function logic changes with caller updates into Patch 1.
- Separated style cleanup (uint -> unsigned int) into Patch 2.
Changes in v5:
- Split the patch into a 3-patch series (suggested by Greg KH).
- Patch 1: Refactored return type to 'int'.
- Patch 2: Added error checks to call sites.
- Patch 3: Implemented -EINVAL logic.
(Note: Superseded by v6 to fix git bisect issues).
Changes in v4:
- Modified _rtw_pktfile_read() to return -EINVAL if data is
insufficient (following Greg KH's hint).
- Replaced 'uint' with 'unsigned int' (suggested by Andy Shevchenko).
- Removed redundant local variable 'len'.
Changes in v3:
- Updated set_qos() from void to int (suggested by Greg KH, Dan Carpenter).
- Fixed coding style issues (suggested by Andy Shevchenko).
Changes in v2:
- Added check for skb_copy_bits() return value.
Thanks,
Minu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 7:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 17:41 [PATCH v6 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() Minu Jin
2026-01-22 17:41 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: update _rtw_pktfile_read() to return error codes Minu Jin
2026-01-27 14:35 ` Greg KH
2026-01-22 17:41 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: clean up _rtw_pktfile_read() Minu Jin
2026-01-23 6:25 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: Fix error handling in _rtw_pktfile_read() Greg KH
2026-01-23 7:26 ` Minu Jin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXMiwivUd_j79kZS@JMW-Ubuntu \
--to=s9430939@naver.com \
--cc=abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=karanja99erick@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=milospuric856@gmail.com \
--cc=weibu@redadmin.org \
--cc=zxcv2569763104@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.