All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 21:30:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXPMYDnNdGeNcJJV@ideak-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260121035330.2793386-12-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 09:23:27AM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Add intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk() helper, that checks the
> required pixel rate against platform dotclock limit.
> With joined pipes the effective dotclock limit depends upon the number
> of joined pipes.
> 
> Call the helper from the mode_valid phase and from the compute_config
> phase where we need to check the limits for the given target clock for a
> given joiner candidate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c     | 26 ++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h     |  3 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 14 +++++------
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 2ead783129f4..ed81cf4adb9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1440,6 +1440,18 @@ bool intel_dp_has_dsc(const struct intel_connector *connector)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +bool intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(struct intel_display *display,

intel_dp_dotclk_valid()?

> +				     int target_clock,
> +				     int num_joined_pipes)
> +{
> +	int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
> +	int effective_dotclk_limit;
> +
> +	effective_dotclk_limit = max_dotclk * num_joined_pipes;
> +
> +	return target_clock <= effective_dotclk_limit;
> +}
> +
>  static enum drm_mode_status
>  intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  		    const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> @@ -1495,7 +1507,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  					   link_bpp_x16, 0);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(joiner_candidates); i++) {
> -		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>  		enum joiner_type joiner = joiner_candidates[i];
>  
>  		status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> @@ -1569,9 +1580,9 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  		if (status != MODE_OK)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> -		if (target_clock <= max_dotclk) {
> +		if (intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(display,
> +						    target_clock,
> +						    num_joined_pipes)) {
>  			status = MODE_OK;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -2888,7 +2899,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(joiner_candidates); i++) {
>  		enum joiner_type joiner = joiner_candidates[i];
> -		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>  
>  		if (joiner == FORCED_JOINER) {
>  			if (!connector->force_joined_pipes)
> @@ -2930,9 +2940,9 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  		if (ret)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> -		if (adjusted_mode->crtc_clock <= max_dotclk) {
> +		if (intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(display,
> +						    adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> +						    num_joined_pipes)) {
>  			ret = 0;
>  			break;
>  		}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> index e5913fba0143..0c1cd843bd0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> @@ -233,5 +233,8 @@ int intel_dp_compute_config_late(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  int intel_dp_sdp_min_guardband(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>  			       bool assume_all_enabled);
>  int intel_dp_hdisplay_limit(struct intel_display *display);
> +bool intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(struct intel_display *display,
> +				     int target_clock,
> +				     int num_joined_pipes);
>  
>  #endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index 46208ee67905..7c957351467e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -710,7 +710,6 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(joiner_candidates); i++) {
>  		enum joiner_type joiner = joiner_candidates[i];
> -		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>  
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -742,9 +741,9 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  		if (ret)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> -		if (adjusted_mode->clock <= max_dotclk) {
> +		if (intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(display,
> +						    adjusted_mode->clock,
> +						    num_joined_pipes)) {
>  			ret = 0;
>  			break;
>  		}
> @@ -1542,7 +1541,6 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(joiner_candidates); i++) {
> -		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
>  		enum joiner_type joiner = joiner_candidates[i];
>  
>  		*status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
> @@ -1593,9 +1591,9 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>  		if (*status != MODE_OK)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> -
> -		if (mode->clock <= max_dotclk) {
> +		if (intel_dp_pixel_rate_fits_dotclk(display,
> +						    mode->clock,
> +						    num_joined_pipes)) {
>  			*status = MODE_OK;
>  			break;
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-23 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-21  3:53 [PATCH 00/14] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 18:06   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 18:25   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 18:28   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21 10:54   ` Jani Nikula
2026-01-21 11:19     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-23 18:44       ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:06   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:11   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:16   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:23   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:30   ` Imre Deak [this message]
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-21  3:53 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-23 19:48   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-21  4:16 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev3) Patchwork
2026-01-21  4:52 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-01-21  5:59 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-01-21  6:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aXPMYDnNdGeNcJJV@ideak-desk \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.