From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
"Randolph Lin" <randolph@andestech.com>,
"Samuel Holland" <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
"Charles Mirabile" <cmirabil@redhat.com>,
tim609@andestech.com,
"Krishna Chaitanya Chundru" <krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: dwc: Improve msg_atu_index error handling
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:03:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXjTs9ji-2ZUspBG@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45ed56fb-15b2-455a-bdac-a208ee93a7da@kernel.org>
On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 05:50:06AM +1100, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2026/01/24 5:28, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > Only try to dedicate an outbound iATU to MSG TLP if use_atu_msg is set.
> > If use_atu_msg is not set, it is completely useless to bump the index.
> >
> > Additionally, if use_atu_msg is set, and there is no outbound iATU
> > available, return an error.
> >
> > Fixes: e1a4ec1a9520 ("PCI: dwc: Add generic MSG TLP support for sending PME_Turn_Off when system suspend")
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > index ae5f2d8a3857..d7f57d77bdf5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > @@ -982,7 +982,14 @@ static int dw_pcie_iatu_setup(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> > dev_warn(pci->dev, "Ranges exceed outbound iATU size (%d)\n",
> > pci->num_ob_windows);
> >
> > - pp->msg_atu_index = ++i;
> > + if (pp->use_atu_msg) {
> > + if (pci->num_ob_windows > ++i) {
>
> if (pp->use_atu_msg) {
> i++;
> if (pci->num_ob_windows > i) {
>
> is far more readable in my opinion.
Yes, I agree that it is more readable.
However, in patch 3/4 in series, I'm do a cleanup of this whole function,
not just this statement.
This patch changes the code in a way that is consistent with the existing
coding style of this function, see e.g.:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.19-rc7/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c#L932-L934
Then patch 3/4 modifies the whole function to be more readable.
So I prefer to still keep this patch as is, such the code is always in a
"consistent coding style".
And then do all cleanups in the cleanup patch.
>
> > + pp->msg_atu_index = i;
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err(pci->dev, "Cannot add outbound window for MSG TLP\n");
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> Seeing this, I do not really see the point of the previous patch since you
> completely nuke that change here. So maybe drop patch 1 ?
My thinking was that the previous patch has
CC: stable, so I wanted the smallest viable backportable fix.
But, I guess that the "if (pp->use_atu_msg) {" guard makes sense even for a
backported fix, as it is pointless to increment the counter if use_atu_msg
is not set, so sure, I can squash patch 1 and 2.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-23 18:28 [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI: dwc: Clean up iATU index mess Niklas Cassel
2026-01-23 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] PCI: dwc: Fix msg_atu_index assignment Niklas Cassel
2026-01-23 18:46 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-01-23 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] PCI: dwc: Improve msg_atu_index error handling Niklas Cassel
2026-01-23 18:50 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-01-27 15:03 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-01-23 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] PCI: dwc: Clean up iATU index usage in dw_pcie_iatu_setup() Niklas Cassel
2026-01-23 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] PCI: dwc: Fix missing iATU setup when ECAM is enabled Niklas Cassel
2026-01-23 18:53 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-01-27 15:02 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXjTs9ji-2ZUspBG@fedora \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cmirabil@redhat.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=krishna.chundru@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=randolph@andestech.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=tim609@andestech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.