All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Qingfang Deng <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: flowtable: dedicated slab for flow entry
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 13:21:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXtQu1eW_GR4lTMH@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALW65ja5wOf-5PAkQY0yt8FO1_gTvfL392Q+S3TKtJoQ1kXFug@mail.gmail.com>

Qingfang Deng <dqfext@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 6:26 PM Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> > Ok, but please use KMEM_CACHE(), we've had a bunch of patches
> > that removed kmem_cache_create() in several places, I would like
> > to avoid a followup patch.
> 
> But I'm creating a slab with a different name (`nf_flow_offload`) from
> the struct name (`flow_offload`). Should I keep the `nf_` prefix?

Then add a comment that its intentional due to the name, else
we'll get a followup 'cleanup patch' to switch to KMEM_CACHE().

      reply	other threads:[~2026-01-29 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-29 10:12 [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: flowtable: dedicated slab for flow entry Qingfang Deng
2026-01-29 10:26 ` Florian Westphal
2026-01-29 12:06   ` Qingfang Deng
2026-01-29 12:21     ` Florian Westphal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aXtQu1eW_GR4lTMH@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.