From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: hch <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [bug report] xfs/802 failure due to mssing fstype report by lsblk
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 08:40:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYWobEmDn0jSPzqo@shinmob> (raw)
Hello Darrick,
Recently, my fstests run for null_blk (8GiB size) as SCRATCH_DEV failed at
xfs/802 [3]. I took a look and observed following points:
1) xfs_scrub_all command ran as expected. Even though SCRATCH_DEV is mounted,
it did not scrub SCRATCH_DEV. Hence the failure.
2) xfs_scrub_all uses lsblk command to list all mounted xfs filesystems [1].
However, lsblk command does not report that SCRATCH_DEV is mounted as xfs.
3) I leanred that lsblk command refers to udev database [2], and udev database
sometimes fails to update the filesystem information. This is the case for
the null_blk as SCRATCH_DEV on my test nodes.
Based on these observations, I think there are two points to improve:
1) I found "blkid -p" command reports that null_blk is mounted as xfs, even when
lsblk does not report it. I think xfs_scrub_all can be modified to use
"blkid -p" instead of lsblk to find out xfs filesystems mounted.
2) When there are other xfs filesystems on the test node than TEST_DEV or
SCRATCH_DEV, xfs_scrub_all changes the status of them. This does not sound
good to me since it affects system status out of the test targets block
devices. I think he test case can be improved to check that there is no other
xfs filesystems mounted other than TEST_DEV or SCRATCH_DEV/s. If not, the
test case should be skipped.
At this moment, I don't have time to create patches for the improvements above.
If anyone can work on them, it will be appreciated.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfsprogs-dev.git/tree/scrub/xfs_scrub_all.py.in#n55
[2] https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/642598/lsblk-file-system-type-not-appears-from-lsblk#642600
[3] xfs/802 failure console message
xfs/802 - output mismatch (see /home/shin/kts/kernel-test-suite/src/xfstests/results//xfs/802.out.bad)
--- tests/xfs/802.out 2026-02-04 20:44:52.254221182 +0900
+++ /home/shin/kts/kernel-test-suite/src/xfstests/results//xfs/802.out.bad 2026-02-06 17:04:24.336536185 +0900
@@ -2,4 +2,7 @@
Format and populate
Scrub Scratch FS
Scrub Everything
+Health status has not been collected for this filesystem.
+Please run xfs_scrub(8) to remedy this situation.
+cannot find evidence that /var/kts/scratch was scrubbed
Scrub Done
...
(Run 'diff -u /home/shin/kts/kernel-test-suite/src/xfstests/tests/xfs/802.out /home/shin/kts/kernel-test-suite/src/xfstests/results//xfs/802.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
next reply other threads:[~2026-02-06 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-06 8:40 Shinichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2026-02-06 17:38 ` [bug report] xfs/802 failure due to mssing fstype report by lsblk Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-09 2:50 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-09 6:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-09 6:28 ` hch
2026-02-09 7:54 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-10 2:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-10 6:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-10 6:19 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-13 22:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-14 6:39 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2026-02-14 7:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYWobEmDn0jSPzqo@shinmob \
--to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.