From: Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ci: make test slicing consistent across Meson/Make
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 12:19:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYojRnqBi8nzZhPD@denethor> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260209-b4-pks-ci-meson-improvements-v1-3-38444dec4874@pks.im>
On 26/02/09 05:56PM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> In the preceding commit we have adjusted test slicing to be one-based
> when using the "ci/run-test-slice.sh" script. But we also have an
> equivalent script for Meson that is still zero-based, which is of course
> inconsistent.
>
> Adapt the script to be one-based, as well, and adapt the GitHub workflow
> accordingly. Note that GitLab doesn't yet use the script, so it does not
> need to be adapted. This will change in the next commit though.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
> ---
> .github/workflows/main.yml | 2 +-
> ci/run-test-slice-meson.sh | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/.github/workflows/main.yml b/.github/workflows/main.yml
> index 2b175dc5c6..1b7a16e1f1 100644
> --- a/.github/workflows/main.yml
> +++ b/.github/workflows/main.yml
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ jobs:
> path: build
> - name: Test
> shell: pwsh
> - run: ci/run-test-slice-meson.sh build ${{matrix.nr}} 10
> + run: ci/run-test-slice-meson.sh build ${{matrix.nr + 1}} 10
Due to the changes in the prior patch, GitHub CI passing 0 as the slice
value would cause a failure correct? I wonder if we should combine this
change with the previous patch. Otherwise this patch looks good.
-Justin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-09 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-09 16:56 [PATCH 0/5] Some assorted fixes for GitLab CI Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-09 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/5] ci: handle failures of test-slice helper Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-09 16:56 ` [PATCH 2/5] ci: don't skip smallest test slice in GitLab Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-09 18:07 ` Justin Tobler
2026-02-09 16:56 ` [PATCH 3/5] ci: make test slicing consistent across Meson/Make Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-09 18:19 ` Justin Tobler [this message]
2026-02-10 5:34 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-10 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-10 22:54 ` Jeff King
2026-02-11 6:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-09 16:56 ` [PATCH 4/5] gitlab-ci: use "run-test-slice-meson.sh" Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-09 16:56 ` [PATCH 5/5] gitlab-ci: handle failed tests on MSVC+Meson job Patrick Steinhardt
2026-02-09 18:33 ` Justin Tobler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYojRnqBi8nzZhPD@denethor \
--to=jltobler@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.