All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: memfd_luo: always make all folios uptodate
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 10:53:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZ64ikDtz8tF_rFU@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260223173931.2221759-2-pratyush@kernel.org>

On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 06:39:28PM +0100, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> From: "Pratyush Yadav (Google)" <pratyush@kernel.org>
> 
> When a folio is added to a shmem file via fallocate, it is not zeroed on
> allocation. This is done as a performance optimization since it is
> possible the folio will never end up being used at all. When the folio
> is used, shmem checks for the uptodate flag, and if absent, zeroes the
> folio (and sets the flag) before returning to user.
> 
> With LUO, the flags of each folio are saved at preserve time. It is
> possible to have a memfd with some folios fallocated but not uptodate.
> For those, the uptodate flag doesn't get saved. The folios might later
> end up being used and become uptodate. They would get passed to the next
> kernel via KHO correctly since they did get preserved. But they won't
> have the MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_UPTODATE flag.
> 
> This means that when the memfd is retrieved, the folios will be added to
> the shmem file without the uptodate flag. They will be zeroed before
> first use, losing the data in those folios.
> 
> Since we take a big performance hit in allocating, zeroing, and pinning
> all folios at prepare time anyway, take some more and zero all
> non-uptodate ones too.
> 
> Later when there is a stronger need to make prepare faster, this can be
> optimized.
> 
> To avoid racing with another uptodate operation, take the folio lock.
> 
> Fixes: b3749f174d68 ("mm: memfd_luo: allow preserving memfd")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav (Google) <pratyush@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>

> ---
>  mm/memfd_luo.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memfd_luo.c b/mm/memfd_luo.c
> index a34fccc23b6a..ccbf1337f650 100644
> --- a/mm/memfd_luo.c
> +++ b/mm/memfd_luo.c
> @@ -152,10 +152,31 @@ static int memfd_luo_preserve_folios(struct file *file,
>  		if (err)
>  			goto err_unpreserve;
>  
> +		folio_lock(folio);
> +
>  		if (folio_test_dirty(folio))
>  			flags |= MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_DIRTY;
> -		if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> -			flags |= MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_UPTODATE;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If the folio is not uptodate, it was fallocated but never
> +		 * used. Saving this flag at prepare() doesn't work since it
> +		 * might change later when someone uses the folio.
> +		 *
> +		 * Since we have taken the performance penalty of allocating,
> +		 * zeroing, and pinning all the folios in the holes, take a bit
> +		 * more and zero all non-uptodate folios too.
> +		 *
> +		 * NOTE: For someone looking to improve preserve performance,
> +		 * this is a good place to look.

I'd add a larger comment above memfd_luo_preserve_folios() that says that
it allocates, pins etc and fold the last two paragraphs of this comment
there.

> +		 */
> +		if (!folio_test_uptodate(folio)) {
> +			folio_zero_range(folio, 0, folio_size(folio));
> +			flush_dcache_folio(folio);
> +			folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> +		}
> +		flags |= MEMFD_LUO_FOLIO_UPTODATE;
> +
> +		folio_unlock(folio);
>  
>  		pfolio->pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
>  		pfolio->flags = flags;
> -- 
> 2.53.0.371.g1d285c8824-goog
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-25  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-23 17:39 [PATCH 0/2] mm: memfd_luo: fixes for folio flag preservation Pratyush Yadav
2026-02-23 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: memfd_luo: always make all folios uptodate Pratyush Yadav
2026-02-25  8:53   ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-03-05  8:50     ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-06 15:44       ` Mike Rapoport
2026-02-23 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: memfd_luo: always dirty all folios Pratyush Yadav
2026-02-25  8:58   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-03-05  8:44     ` Pratyush Yadav
2026-03-05 10:40       ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aZ64ikDtz8tF_rFU@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.