From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/13] hwspinlock: add callback to fill private data of a hwspinlock
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:29:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZLVU9toZRX2vKX7@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e495cc2-3469-4855-8645-c5633d937f1e@omp.ru>
> Don't you break the existing users of this API with this change? I see
> you're fixing them up in the followup patches but that's not how it should
> be done -- the compilation shouldn't be broken...
I am not breaking them. The helper is an additional feature and the old
way still works until patch 8. Until then, all users are converted.
I built tested it :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-16 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-15 22:54 [RFC v2 PATCH 00/13] hwspinlock: move device alloc into core and refactor includes Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/13] hwspinlock: add helpers to retrieve core data Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/13] hwspinlock: add callback to fill private data of a hwspinlock Wolfram Sang
2026-02-16 8:05 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2026-02-16 8:29 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2026-02-16 10:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-02-16 10:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-02-16 16:12 ` Sergey Shtylyov
2026-02-16 16:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/13] hwspinlock: omap: use new callback to initialize hwspinlock priv Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/13] hwspinlock: qcom: " Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/13] hwspinlock: sprd: " Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/13] hwspinlock: stm32: " Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/13] hwspinlock: sun6i: " Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/13] hwspinlock: handle hwspinlock device allocation in the core Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/13] hwspinlock: move entries from internal to public header Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/13] hwspinlock: remove internal header Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/13] hwspinlock: sort include and update copyright Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/13] hwspinlock: refactor provider.h from public header Wolfram Sang
2026-02-15 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/13] hwspinlock: refactor consumer.h " Wolfram Sang
2026-02-16 7:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-16 16:07 ` Mark Brown
2026-02-18 19:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-02-16 7:40 ` [RFC v2 PATCH 00/13] hwspinlock: move device alloc into core and refactor includes Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-16 8:34 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZLVU9toZRX2vKX7@ninjato \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.