From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Moritz Sanft <ms@edgeless.systems>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] efi: Fix alignenment issues in unaccepted memory code
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 14:09:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZRaiCidlfNtPG17@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260217104957.249340-1-kas@kernel.org>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 10:49:55AM +0000, Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) wrote:
> This series addresses two issues related to unaligned physical addresses
> and sizes when handling EFI unaccepted memory. These issues were
> identified as potential sources of kernel panics in Intel TDX
> environments due to incomplete memory reservation or missing "guard page"
> extensions.
>
> The first patch fixes the reservation of the unaccepted memory table
> itself in efi_config_parse_tables(). It ensures the entire page range
> covering the table is reserved even if the table doesn't start on a
> page boundary.
>
> The second patch ensures that memory acceptance requests in
> accept_memory() and range_contains_unaccepted_memory() are page-aligned
> before performing the unit_size alignment check. This prevents skipping
> the necessary "guard page" extension for unaligned ranges, which is
> required to avoid crashes with load_unaligned_zeropad().
>
> v2:
> - Fix 'end' calculation in the second patch (Tom)
>
> Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) (2):
> efi: Fix reservation of unaccepted memory table
> efi: Align unaccepted memory range to page boundary
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/firmware/efi/unaccepted_memory.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.51.2
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-17 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-17 10:49 [PATCHv2 0/2] efi: Fix alignenment issues in unaccepted memory code Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-02-17 10:49 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] efi: Fix reservation of unaccepted memory table Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-02-17 10:49 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] efi: Align unaccepted memory range to page boundary Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)
2026-02-17 10:58 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] efi: Fix alignenment issues in unaccepted memory code Ard Biesheuvel
2026-02-17 12:09 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-02-17 13:56 ` Tom Lendacky
2026-02-19 9:26 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZRaiCidlfNtPG17@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ms@edgeless.systems \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.