From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
Cc: "Salah Triki" <salah.triki@gmail.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iio: trigger: use put_device() in viio_trigger_alloc() error path
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:08:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZSEVpQBgHlRHbeW@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96b05a514d229b23ea0917447607dd7390ec0e2e.camel@gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 01:51:08PM +0000, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Mon, 2026-02-16 at 09:45 +0100, Salah Triki wrote:
> >
> > You are absolutely right. My previous version (v3) was logically flawed as
> > it could trigger the release callback before the necessary fields were
> > initialized, leading to an unsafe irq_free_descs() call.
> >
> > Since I don't have the physical hardware to perform runtime injection
> > tests,I relied on manual code path analysis and clearly failed to account
> > for the side effects of put_device().
> >
> > I'm sending a v4 which takes the safer approach: moving
> > device_initialize() after all potential failure points. This way, we can
> > safely use kfree() and irq_free_descs() in the error path without
> > involving the device lifecycle prematurely.
> >
> > Thank you for the catch.
>
> Please just use the same approach Andy did for iio_device_alloc(). I posted
> links (in one of your versions) to that and for the discussion we already had
> on this same function some time ago.
I believe this is the approach mentioned above, id est move device_initialize()
further in the code. But I might misread something...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-17 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-15 22:23 [PATCH v3] iio: trigger: use put_device() in viio_trigger_alloc() error path Salah Triki
2026-02-16 7:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-02-16 8:45 ` Salah Triki
2026-02-17 13:51 ` Nuno Sá
2026-02-17 15:08 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-02-18 9:14 ` Nuno Sá
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZSEVpQBgHlRHbeW@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=salah.triki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.