From: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
To: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] HID: apple: avoid memory leak in apple_report_fixup()
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 20:04:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZYMcsHlWL5pDHdR@plouf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZTEnPEHcWEkoTJR@google.com>
On Feb 17 2026, Günther Noack wrote:
> Hello Benjamin!
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 07:22:20PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Feb 17 2026, Günther Noack wrote:
> > > The apple_report_fixup() function was allocating a new buffer with
> > > kmemdup() but never freeing it. Since the caller of report_fixup() already
> > > provides a writable buffer and allows returning a pointer within that
> > > buffer, we can just modify the descriptor in-place and return the adjusted
> > > pointer.
> > >
> > > Assisted-by: Gemini-CLI:Google Gemini 3
> > > Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/hid/hid-apple.c | 4 +---
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-apple.c b/drivers/hid/hid-apple.c
> > > index 233e367cce1d..894adc23367b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-apple.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-apple.c
> > > @@ -686,9 +686,7 @@ static const __u8 *apple_report_fixup(struct hid_device *hdev, __u8 *rdesc,
> > > hid_info(hdev,
> > > "fixing up Magic Keyboard battery report descriptor\n");
> > > *rsize = *rsize - 1;
> > > - rdesc = kmemdup(rdesc + 1, *rsize, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > - if (!rdesc)
> > > - return NULL;
> > > + rdesc = rdesc + 1;
> >
> > I might be wrong, but later we call free(dev->rdesc) on device removal.
> > AFAICT, incrementing the pointer is undefined behavior.
> >
> > What we should do instead is probably a krealloc instead of a kmemdup.
> >
> > Same for all 3 patches.
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Let me try to address your three responses in one reply.
>
> I am happy to accept it if I am wrong about this, but I don't
> understand your reasoning. (This should go without saying, but maybe
> is worth reiterating, I would not have sent this if I had not
> convinced myself independently of LLM-assisted reasoning.)
>
> Let me explain my reasoning based on the place where .report_fixup()
> is called from, which is hid_open_report() in hid-core.c:
>
>
> start = device->bpf_rdesc; /* (1) */
> if (WARN_ON(!start))
> return -ENODEV;
> size = device->bpf_rsize;
>
> if (device->driver->report_fixup) {
> /*
> * device->driver->report_fixup() needs to work
> * on a copy of our report descriptor so it can
> * change it.
> */
> __u8 *buf = kmemdup(start, size, GFP_KERNEL); /* (2) */
>
> if (buf == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> start = device->driver->report_fixup(device, buf, &size); /* (3) */
>
> /*
> * The second kmemdup is required in case report_fixup() returns
> * a static read-only memory, but we have no idea if that memory
> * needs to be cleaned up or not at the end.
> */
> start = kmemdup(start, size, GFP_KERNEL); /* (4) */
> kfree(buf); /* (5) */
> if (start == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> device->rdesc = start;
> device->rsize = size;
>
>
> This function uses a slightly elaborate scheme to call .report_fixup:
>
> (1) start is assigned to the original device->bpf_rdesc
> (2) buf is assigned to a copy of the 'start' buffer (deallocated in (5)).
> . It is done because buf is meant to be mutated by .report_fixup()
> . (3) start = ...->report_fixup(..., buf, ...)
> . (4) start = kmemdup(start, ...)
> (5) deallocate buf
Ouch. Yeah, sorry. I wrote that code and it seemed I completely paged
it out. Your code is actually correct (all three) but it would be nice
to have a longer commit message explaining this above.
The main point of this alloc before calling fixup is because some
drivers are using a static array as the new report descriptor. So we can
not free it later on. Working on a known copy allows to handle the kfree
correctly.
So yes, sorry, returning rdesc+1 in 1/3 and 2/3 is correct, and using a
devm_kzalloc is too in 3/3.
Cheers,
Benjamin
>
> Importantly:
>
> (a) The buffer buf passed to report_fixup() is a copy of the report
> descriptor whose lifetime spans only from (2) to (5).
> (b) The result of .report_fixup(), start, is immediately discarded in
> (4) and reassigned to the start variable again.
>
> From (b), we can see that the result of .report_fixup() does *not* get
> deallocated by the caller, and thus, when the driver wants to return a
> newly allocated array, is must also hold a reference to it so that it
> can deallocate it later.
>
> From (a), we can see that the report_fixup hook is free to manipulate
> the contents of the buffer that it receives, but if we were to
> *reallocate* it within report_fixup, as you are suggesting above, it
> could become a double free:
>
> * During realloc, the allocator would potentially have to move the
> buffer to a place where there is enough space, freeing up the old
> place and allocating a new place. [1]
> * In (5), we would then pass the original (now deallocated) buf
> pointer to kfree, leading to a double free.
>
> If I were to describe the current interface of the hook
> .report_fixup(dev, rdesc, rsize), it would be:
>
> * report_fixup may modify rdesc[0] to rdesc[rsize-1]
> * report_fixup may *not* deallocate rdesc
> (ownership of rdesc stays with the caller)
> * specifically, it may also not reallocate rdesc
> (because that may imply a deallocation)
> * report_fixup returns a pointer to a buffer for which it can
> guarantee that it lives long enough for the kmemdup in (4), but
> which will *not* be deallocated by the caller (see (b) above). The
> three techniques I have found for that are:
> * returning a subsection of the rdesc that it received
> * returning a pointer into a statically allocated array
> (e.g. motion_fixup() and ps3remote_fixup() in hid-sony.c)
> * allocating it with a devm_*() function. My understanding was
> that this ties it to the lifetime of the device. (e.g. the
> QUIRK_G752_KEYBOARD case in hid-asus.c)
>
> Honestly, I still think that this reasoning holds, but I am happy to
> be convinced otherwise. Please let me know what you think.
>
> —Günther
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-18 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-17 16:01 [PATCH 0/3] HID: Fix some memory leaks in drivers/hid Günther Noack
2026-02-17 16:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] HID: apple: avoid memory leak in apple_report_fixup() Günther Noack
2026-02-17 18:22 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2026-02-17 19:42 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-18 19:04 ` Benjamin Tissoires [this message]
2026-02-19 15:47 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-17 16:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] HID: magicmouse: avoid memory leak in magicmouse_report_fixup() Günther Noack
2026-02-17 16:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] HID: asus: avoid memory leak in asus_report_fixup() Günther Noack
2026-02-17 18:31 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2026-02-17 19:51 ` Günther Noack
2026-02-17 18:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] HID: Fix some memory leaks in drivers/hid Benjamin Tissoires
2026-02-17 20:08 ` Günther Noack
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-18 4:04 [PATCH 1/3] HID: apple: avoid memory leak in apple_report_fixup() kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZYMcsHlWL5pDHdR@plouf \
--to=bentiss@kernel.org \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.