From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [TEST] nft_queue / test_udp_gro_ct flakes
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 16:11:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aZcoDclA37Pk3UJp@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260218184114.0b405b72@kernel.org>
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 16:30:40 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Without the preceding patch, this fails with:
> >
> > FAIL: test_udp_gro_ct: Expected udp conntrack entry
> > FAIL: test_udp_gro_ct: Expected software segmentation to occur, had 10 and 0
>
> Hi Florian!
>
> This test case is a bit flaky for us on debug kernels:
>
> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?pass=0&test=nft-queue-sh
>
> It's 3rd flakiest of all netdev selftests at this point.
Ouch. Sorry about this, I will look at this asap.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-06 15:30 [PATCH v2 net-next 00/11] netfilter: updates for net-next Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 01/11] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: don't gc elements on insert Florian Westphal
2026-02-11 5:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 02/11] netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: do shared-unconfirmed check before segmentation Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 03/11] selftests: netfilter: nft_queue.sh: add udp fraglist gro test case Florian Westphal
2026-02-19 2:41 ` [TEST] nft_queue / test_udp_gro_ct flakes Jakub Kicinski
2026-02-19 15:11 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 04/11] netfilter: flowtable: dedicated slab for flow entry Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 05/11] selftests: netfilter: add IPV6_TUNNEL to config Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 06/11] netfilter: nft_set_hash: fix get operation on big endian Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 07/11] netfilter: nft_counter: fix reset of counters on 32bit archs Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 08/11] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: fix bogus EEXIST with NLM_F_CREATE with null interval Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 09/11] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: check for partial overlaps in anonymous sets Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 10/11] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: validate element belonging to interval Florian Westphal
2026-02-06 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 11/11] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: validate open interval overlap Florian Westphal
2026-02-10 11:49 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-02-10 15:29 ` Florian Westphal
2026-02-11 3:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aZcoDclA37Pk3UJp@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.