From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, kafai@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
eddyz87@gmail.com, Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for sleepable raw tracepoint programs
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:11:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa83cJrghkxkIs9A@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260225-sleepable_tracepoints-v2-6-0330dafd650f@meta.com>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 08:23:54AM -0800, Mykyta Yatsenko wrote:
> From: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
>
> Add two subtests:
> - success: Attach a sleepable BPF program to the faultable sys_enter
> tracepoint (tp_btf.s/sys_enter). Verify the program is triggered by
> a syscall.
> - reject_non_faultable: Attempt to attach a sleepable BPF program to
> a non-faultable tracepoint (tp_btf.s/sched_switch). Verify that
> attachment is rejected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sleepable_raw_tp.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_sleepable_raw_tp.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++
> .../bpf/progs/test_sleepable_raw_tp_fail.c | 16 +++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sleepable.c | 5 +-
> 4 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sleepable_raw_tp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sleepable_raw_tp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9b0ec7cc4cac
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sleepable_raw_tp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> +
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <time.h>
> +#include "test_sleepable_raw_tp.skel.h"
> +#include "test_sleepable_raw_tp_fail.skel.h"
> +
> +static void test_sleepable_raw_tp_success(void)
> +{
> + struct test_sleepable_raw_tp *skel;
> + int err;
> +
> + skel = test_sleepable_raw_tp__open_and_load();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_load"))
> + return;
> +
> + skel->bss->target_pid = getpid();
> +
> + err = test_sleepable_raw_tp__attach(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + syscall(__NR_nanosleep, &(struct timespec){ .tv_nsec = 555 }, NULL);
> +
> + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->triggered, 1, "triggered");
> + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->err, 0, "err");
> + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->copied_tv_nsec, 555, "copied_tv_nsec");
> +
> +cleanup:
> + test_sleepable_raw_tp__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_sleepable_raw_tp_reject(void)
> +{
> + struct test_sleepable_raw_tp_fail *skel;
> + int err;
> +
> + skel = test_sleepable_raw_tp_fail__open_and_load();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_load"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + err = test_sleepable_raw_tp_fail__attach(skel);
> + ASSERT_ERR(err, "skel_attach_should_fail");
would it be better to call RUN_TESTS(test_sleepable_raw_tp_fail) instead?
you could also check the verifier output
jirka
> +
> +cleanup:
> + test_sleepable_raw_tp_fail__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> +void test_sleepable_raw_tp(void)
> +{
> + if (test__start_subtest("success"))
> + test_sleepable_raw_tp_success();
> + if (test__start_subtest("reject_non_faultable"))
> + test_sleepable_raw_tp_reject();
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sleepable_raw_tp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sleepable_raw_tp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ebacc766df57
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sleepable_raw_tp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> +
> +#include <vmlinux.h>
> +#include <asm/unistd.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +int target_pid;
> +int triggered;
> +long err;
> +long copied_tv_nsec;
> +
> +SEC("tp_btf.s/sys_enter")
> +int BPF_PROG(test_sleepable_sys_enter, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
> + struct __kernel_timespec *ts;
> + long tv_nsec;
> +
> + if (task->pid != target_pid)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (id != __NR_nanosleep)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ts = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL(regs);
> +
> + /*
> + * Use bpf_copy_from_user() - a sleepable helper - to read user memory.
> + * This exercises the sleepable execution path of raw tracepoints.
> + */
> + err = bpf_copy_from_user(&tv_nsec, sizeof(tv_nsec), &ts->tv_nsec);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + copied_tv_nsec = tv_nsec;
> + triggered = 1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sleepable_raw_tp_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sleepable_raw_tp_fail.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ef5dc3888df6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sleepable_raw_tp_fail.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Copyright (c) 2025 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
> +
> +#include <vmlinux.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +/* Sleepable program on a non-faultable tracepoint should fail at attach */
> +SEC("tp_btf.s/sched_switch")
> +int BPF_PROG(test_sleepable_sched_switch, bool preempt,
> + struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sleepable.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sleepable.c
> index 1f0d2bdc673f..39522b7cd317 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sleepable.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sleepable.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
> .runs = -1,
> },
> {
> - "sleepable raw tracepoint reject",
> + "sleepable raw tracepoint accept",
> .insns = {
> BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> @@ -84,8 +84,7 @@
> .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
> .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP,
> .kfunc = "sched_switch",
> - .result = REJECT,
> - .errstr = "Only fentry/fexit/fmod_ret, lsm, iter, uprobe, and struct_ops programs can be sleepable",
> + .result = ACCEPT,
> .flags = BPF_F_SLEEPABLE,
> .runs = -1,
> },
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-25 16:23 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf: Add support for sleepable raw tracepoint programs Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-02-25 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] bpf: Reject sleepable raw_tp programs on non-faultable tracepoints Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-03-06 3:59 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-02-25 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] bpf: Add sleepable execution path for raw tracepoint programs Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-02-25 17:12 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-06 4:23 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-06 4:52 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-10 17:38 ` Yonghong Song
2026-02-25 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] bpf: Remove preempt_disable from faultable tracepoint BPF callbacks Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-03-06 4:25 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-02-25 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] bpf: Allow sleepable programs for BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP attach type Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-03-06 4:26 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-02-25 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] libbpf: Add tp_btf.s section handler for sleepable raw tracepoints Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-03-06 4:26 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-02-25 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for sleepable raw tracepoint programs Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-03-06 4:41 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-06 23:56 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-03-09 21:11 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2026-03-10 0:22 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa83cJrghkxkIs9A@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@meta.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
--cc=yatsenko@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.