From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03CF73FB066 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 14:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772460357; cv=none; b=Zcu2Wd9Av0e44ahe+CE62S/8RI5PHNotHHV/wK08sbKKUM9MKvpEro9Jdgvipp/vm5V2O5EjB1/TFgPWiCbqYfLgpmuakCIigmHhZZu16+TY4fmaj1N4W4F5KUqIzoB9N+M7/7M4AZgctDMK5Lk7kFwvGJuaLq7doQ3OhVs9tQo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772460357; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QXoOraSuBz+Dt8jV1pHCfQO70vsAR0gJLEmUXyrxxEI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fGMUTCkUo6H0qveFHiVYoOnyqTW/84CLlnVSLjFEXDPcndlcPfOP58NnoWCH7cScPU99bsfa9gJozJod68jKduZh8qXL4WFqmeaATRgJAHenwcY69RDS4Q5hhTvpccKsIvZlqMFT5/ywFnNq0BeEqfABXYzW4TaayaXCayyrZgA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=BKLiSzKJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BKLiSzKJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7341CC19423; Mon, 2 Mar 2026 14:05:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772460356; bh=QXoOraSuBz+Dt8jV1pHCfQO70vsAR0gJLEmUXyrxxEI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BKLiSzKJImMMklWAz+8bSgbFCe7SpYJ+MVyx8+0/8/ln5o3au1QRnOuEQLXkkDk2n IpSPIWM+EpCLBaXNaggNZosOk40fGwoOIGJonvigT5r5aTqfh9akXi3lZBKa+ghngh dfXMx3s/6DbvA20j2xPRJGtWXqLJGCxpdKmzcrAuSML+1CHHLkrakfnIoMNFEEQdQ1 ltaUX0KpDKepeaQEChaJXoZ9V9tyw79ALUrcdzmZzesfe/tFuvtIBRkL7JGr5+yB8X +jHSFUVM/QHYQFSsVNOWjcMy/fd8mN4yDe/zhUYoOdLMHO9Fdj3k1jS0pQ9TEV7xvc BK5LdXEMSMwFw== Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 09:05:55 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Greg KH , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Consider applying patch to 6.12.y Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 02:15:49AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote: >Hi Greg, Sasha, > >Sending this separately in case you don't track all replies to the >`FAILED:` messages: > > https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72nHESphKjW7uXm2D7HCNWNxmZ3nv+CSgrzEGgSKZ4_taA@mail.gmail.com/ > >I am not sure why the patch failed to apply -- I would like to >understand what happened there, in case I am missing something. I >suspect something odd happened, since other of those `FAILED:` >messages were strange too, i.e. most of them didn't seem to apply the >`# ...` instructions, which is why most failed. > >But at least for that particular one, the patch should still be >applied and it should have been cherry-pickable as far as I can tell: > > 0a9be83e57de ("rust: kbuild: pass `-Zunstable-options` for Rust 1.95.0") > >So if you cannot apply it, please let me know! Hi Miguel, It's already in the 6.12 tree. There's a quick explanation of what went wrong with those queues (and caused the FAILED: spam) here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aaWWE5uQqz_eG69i@laps/ . I'll spin up -rc2 with those missing commits. -- Thanks, Sasha