From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: memcg: separate slab stat accounting from objcg charge cache
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 14:20:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaYNDbFZ2AHM7gKt@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260302195305.620713-6-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 02:50:18PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Cgroup slab metrics are cached per-cpu the same way as the sub-page
> charge cache. However, the intertwined code to manage those dependent
> caches right now is quite difficult to follow.
>
> Specifically, cached slab stat updates occur in consume() if there was
> enough charge cache to satisfy the new object. If that fails, whole
> pages are reserved, and slab stats are updated when the remainder of
> those pages, after subtracting the size of the new slab object, are
> put into the charge cache. This already juggles a delicate mix of the
> object size, the page charge size, and the remainder to put into the
> byte cache. Doing slab accounting in this path as well is fragile, and
> has recently caused a bug where the input parameters between the two
> caches were mixed up.
>
> Refactor the consume() and refill() paths into unlocked and locked
> variants that only do charge caching. Then let the slab path manage
> its own lock section and open-code charging and accounting.
>
> This makes the slab stat cache subordinate to the charge cache:
> __refill_obj_stock() is called first to prepare it;
> __account_obj_stock() follows to hitch a ride.
>
> This results in a minor behavioral change: previously, a mismatching
> percpu stock would always be drained for the purpose of setting up
> slab account caching, even if there was no byte remainder to put into
> the charge cache. Now, the stock is left alone, and slab accounting
> takes the uncached path if there is a mismatch. This is exceedingly
> rare, and it was probably never worth draining the whole stock just to
> cache the slab stat update.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Thanks, this looks much better.
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 19:50 [PATCH 0/5]: memcg: obj stock and slab stat caching cleanups Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm: memcg: factor out trylock_stock() and unlock_stock() Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 21:43 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-03 7:56 ` Hao Li
2026-03-03 9:23 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-05 13:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: memcg: simplify objcg charge size and stock remainder math Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 21:44 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-03 8:01 ` Hao Li
2026-03-03 9:34 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: memcontrol: split out __obj_cgroup_charge() Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 21:45 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-03 8:04 ` Hao Li
2026-03-03 9:37 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: memcontrol: use __account_obj_stock() in the !locked path Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 21:50 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-03 8:06 ` Hao Li
2026-03-03 9:39 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: memcg: separate slab stat accounting from objcg charge cache Johannes Weiner
2026-03-02 22:20 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-03-03 8:54 ` Hao Li
2026-03-03 10:42 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-03 13:45 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-03 15:43 ` Johannes Weiner
2026-03-03 16:26 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-03-04 0:38 ` Hao Li
2026-03-04 13:02 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-03-03 21:11 ` [PATCH 0/5]: memcg: obj stock and slab stat caching cleanups Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaYNDbFZ2AHM7gKt@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.