From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Josef Bacik" <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, thevlad@meta.com, kernel-team@meta.com,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-cgroup: always display debug stats in io.stat
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 01:56:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaf98kejfRuMvIu3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aacehv3rpO9irhEG@slm.duckdns.org>
Hello Tejun,
On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 07:46:46AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2026 at 06:11:15AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Before (without blkcg_debug_stats enabled):
> > 253:0 rbytes=6273024 wbytes=0 rios=20 wios=0 dbytes=0 dios=0 cost.usage=0
> >
> > After:
> > 253:0 rbytes=6273024 wbytes=0 rios=20 wios=0 dbytes=0 dios=0 cost.usage=0 cost.wait=0 cost.indebt=0 cost.indelay=0
>
> Given that they haven't changed for a long time, maybe it's okay to expose
> them by default, but why? This is something which can be toggled on easily
> at any time.
My goal is to ship a kernel that exposes these detailed io stats by
default, without requiring any runtime configuration. The stats should
simply be available out of the box.
> What's the benefit of exposing these extra numbers which
> probably don't mean much for most people?
My original plan was to introduce a Kconfig option for this. In v1 (about a
month ago), Michal suggested removing the toggle entirely and always exposing
the stats, which seemed reasonable to me and received no objections, so I
went ahead with that approach.
To be clear: is your position that we should not support building a kernel
that always exposes the detailed stats in io.stat?
Thanks for your review,
--breno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-04 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-03 14:11 [PATCH v2] blk-cgroup: always display debug stats in io.stat Breno Leitao
2026-03-03 17:46 ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-04 9:56 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-03-04 16:48 ` Tejun Heo
2026-03-04 17:11 ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-04 13:28 ` Michal Koutný
2026-03-04 13:48 ` Breno Leitao
2026-03-04 16:42 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaf98kejfRuMvIu3@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=thevlad@meta.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.