From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA47F13D891 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2026 12:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772627477; cv=none; b=hvhn/OEB7ehOvEvicU/OU2GKmvgh7c283bTXZ33nUUFjf5sUvFEL/+7DACNRZvdoR/Vh4/yfNVPGeA+R3p2wPW6Iqk28/pSL6SOl2CYCdm37xc88SyTIU203dLLYH04nIDVC1PQ1TwvFkLIXW0tRFydpxVLY3RZ8GvRuOcc4JOI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772627477; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2tmX/10/Ya0RSL6g9TTxFd/61Asih9+Ls1Rmbrn+oXU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uhdn0zbiiyKyffhE++YNeZwN6nIgzgLD4Wd0d/hkjuKZiwwFLnpDHVqAyGPoj57wcKsmV4fcE3Zakz0jlPJngNX2+TRn8d2PwXKjHD97z3ID2zuPvZF1YuZKo+wbKGId6bLd0M1kLksR8920ms2NXwuycdOFdNTnqjWjouK7aKs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=khbYymk0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="khbYymk0" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=Kt9Y 4eTW3GNK5rnnv1fLAY69rSQ2cl2KSLwn89f3c7U=; b=khbYymk0rGp9DTpDDXD2 OC6FzmLvPQWdbaKi4ISIT5WpmS5Ohf+LSeo9fVmLVd+t4BJBv9U3u+rCAmH7Vg1Y OJ43WC/VDZw8sCEV+831ozGRGazIeKt4H3jZV6cKf4g1ccQYm2y6EfzavpUStAw9 JY1x/RM08WHeUmCO5Dwxhg96fFIgSaVuJe+0gwbQZ8JStXlJ5MEWddPuOW/YZgLa uc3R+GEoPTFJObXdxdQ15YHfpDv5lLHqRLBlCbC53wTK5lg4CSClT1X12YWzv7Bn AyUgY1dzxE2AgzjsTd3OpNPHeaHZoJwnITdYrmRlSJb0XTeNUU2RxgCxy7XrL6ZE lw== Received: (qmail 733935 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2026 13:31:10 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 4 Mar 2026 13:31:10 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@EiOv/jFM8m5tKXG7 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 13:31:09 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Cosmin Tanislav , Fabrizio Castro , Geert Uytterhoeven , Tommaso Merciai , Magnus Damm , Linux-Renesas , Chris Paterson , Kuninori Morimoto Subject: Re: Lack of review from Renesas Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Krzysztof, > I told you more than once that it is perfectly fine for us if you skip > reviews until peolpe you trust (e.g. Geert or me) have reviewed them. Can we agree on this now or do we need further discussion? Happy hacking, Wolfram