From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>
To: "Viorel Suman (OSS)" <viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: imx-tpm: keep channel state instead of counting
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 10:29:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aalMdTmQd075dcF1@monoceros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260202104738.837016-1-viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1656 bytes --]
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote:
> On a soft reset TPM PWM IP may preserve its internal state from
> previous runtime, therefore on a subsequent OS boot and driver
> probe "enable_count" value and TPM PWM IP internal channels
> "enabled" states may get unaligned. In consequence on a suspend/resume
> cycle the call "if (--tpm->enable_count == 0)" may lead to
> "enable_count" overflow the system being blocked from entering
> suspend due to:
>
> if (tpm->enable_count > 0)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> Fix the problem by replacing counting logic with per-channel state
> handling and by aligning IP and driver state at probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viorel Suman (OSS) <viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com>
I wonder if the following change would be enough:
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
index 5b399de16d60..36f873133f94 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx-tpm.c
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int pwm_imx_tpm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct clk *clk;
void __iomem *base;
int ret;
- unsigned int npwm;
+ unsigned int i, npwm;
u32 val;
base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
@@ -382,6 +382,12 @@ static int pwm_imx_tpm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mutex_init(&tpm->lock);
+ for (i = 0; i < npwm; ++i) {
+ val = readl(base + PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC(i));
+ if (FIELD_GET(PWM_IMX_TPM_CnSC_ELS, val))
+ ++tpm->enable_count;
+ }
+
ret = devm_pwmchip_add(&pdev->dev, chip);
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to add PWM chip\n");
Best regards
Uwe
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 10:47 [PATCH v2] pwm: imx-tpm: keep channel state instead of counting Viorel Suman (OSS)
2026-03-05 9:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2026-03-11 10:25 ` Viorel Suman (OSS)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aalMdTmQd075dcF1@monoceros \
--to=ukleinek@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=viorel.suman@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.